Feature/add workflows

[guibranco]

User description

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

ℹ Additional Information

---

Description

• Introduced multiple GitHub workflows for CI/CD processes including build, deploy, and quality checks.
• Added a pre-commit hook to enforce branch naming conventions.
• Configured Dependabot for automated dependency management.
• Implemented a secrets check workflow using Infisical.
• Enhanced documentation generation and size labeling for pull requests.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

9 files pre-commit Add Branch Name Validation Pre-commit Hook                              .githooks/pre-commit Added a pre-commit hook for branch name validation. Ensures branch names adhere to a specific regex pattern. +16/-0    dependabot.yml Configure Dependabot for Dependency Management                      .github/dependabot.yml Added configuration for Dependabot to manage npm and GitHub Actions dependencies. Set weekly update schedule and limits for open pull requests. +28/-0    build.yml Update Build Workflow Configuration                                            .github/workflows/build.yml Updated build workflow to include fetch-depth configuration. Ensures complete history is available for builds. +2/-0      deploy.yml Add Build and Deploy Workflow via FTP                                        .github/workflows/deploy.yml Added a new workflow for building and deploying via FTP. Includes steps for versioning, building, and testing. +77/-0    infisical-secrets-check.yml Add Infisical Secrets Check Workflow                                          .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml Introduced a workflow for checking secrets using Infisical. Runs on pull requests and manual triggers. +24/-0    size-label.yml Add Size Labeling Workflow for PRs                                              .github/workflows/size-label.yml Created a workflow to label pull requests based on their size. Triggers on pull request events. +27/-0    snorkell-auto-documentation.yml Update Snorkell Auto Documentation Workflow                            .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml Updated documentation generation workflow. Ensures proper execution of documentation generation steps. +6/-6      sonar-cloud.yml Add SonarCloud Analysis Workflow                                                  .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml Added SonarCloud analysis workflow for code quality checks. Runs on pushes and pull requests to the main branch. +44/-0    GitVersion.yml Configure GitVersion for Continuous Delivery                          GitVersion.yml Configured GitVersion for continuous delivery mode. Specifies the workflow to be used. +2/-0

---

💡 Penify usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated GitHub Actions workflow for Sonar Cloud analysis to streamline test execution.
  • Adjusted triggers for workflow execution on specific events related to the main branch and pull requests.
  • Added SonarLint configuration for enhanced code quality analysis in Visual Studio Code.
  • Introduced properties for project identification in SonarQube integration.
  • Expanded coverage reporting options in testing configuration to include LCOV format.

[code-genius-code-coverage]

The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow configuration for Sonar Cloud analysis. Key updates include adjusting the triggers for the workflow, implementing concurrency settings to manage workflow instances, and refining the job steps for executing tests. Notably, the removal of the --watchAll=false option from the test command alters how tests are run. Additionally, new configurations for SonarLint integration and properties for SonarQube project identification have been added.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml	Modified workflow triggers, added concurrency settings, updated test command by removing --watchAll=false, and maintained authentication setup with environment variables.
.vscode/settings.json	Added SonarLint configuration with connectionId set to "apibr" and projectKey set to "ApiBR_catalog".
sonar-project.properties	Added properties sonar.projectKey=ApiBR_catalog and sonar.organization=apibr for SonarQube integration.
vite.config.ts	Updated coverage reporter settings to include lcov in addition to text and html.

Poem

In the garden where tests do play,
A workflow blooms, bright as the day.
With Sonar's watch, we leap and bound,
In code's embrace, new joys are found.
🐇✨ Let the branches dance and sway,
For every push brings a brighter way!

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 26 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2fb022f and 01a43b9.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	4, because the PR introduces multiple new workflows and configurations which require careful review to ensure they function correctly and adhere to project standards.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	Duplicate Code: There are several instances of duplicated code in the workflow files, such as in .github/workflows/deploy.yml and .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml. This could lead to maintenance issues in the future.
	Configuration Consistency: Ensure that the configurations across different workflows are consistent, especially regarding Node.js versions and package management.
🔒 Security concerns	No

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Security	Configure the secrets check action to fail the workflow if any secrets are detected Ensure that the Infisical secrets check action is configured to fail the workflow if secrets are found. .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [23] - name: Infisical secrets check uses: guibranco/[email protected] + with: + fail_on_secrets: true Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Configuring the secrets check action to fail the workflow is crucial for security, as it prevents potential exposure of sensitive information, making this a high-priority suggestion.	9
Possible bug	Set a default value for fullSemVer to prevent potential errors in downstream jobs Ensure that the fullSemVer output is properly set in the build job to avoid issues in the create_release job. .github/workflows/deploy.yml [17] outputs: - fullSemVer: ${{ steps.gitversion.outputs.fullSemVer }} + fullSemVer: ${{ steps.gitversion.outputs.fullSemVer || '0.0.0' }} Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Setting a default value for fullSemVer is a good practice to prevent potential errors in downstream jobs, making this a significant improvement.	8
Possible issue	Improve the branch name regex pattern for better validation Consider using a more specific regex pattern to avoid potential false positives or negatives in branch name validation. .githooks/pre-commit [6] -valid_branch_regex="^(penify|gitauto|dependabot|feature|fix|docs|style|refactor|perf|hotfix|test|chore|create)(\/[a-zA-Z0-9#._-]+)+$" +valid_branch_regex="^(penify|gitauto|dependabot|feature|fix|docs|style|refactor|perf|hotfix|test|chore|create)(\/[a-zA-Z0-9#._-]+)?$" Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion to improve the regex pattern for branch name validation is valid, as it could enhance the accuracy of branch name checks, although the current pattern is already functional.	7
Performance	Add caching for node modules to enhance build performance Consider adding a step to cache node modules to improve build performance. .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml [24-25] +- name: Cache node modules + uses: actions/cache@v2 + with: + path: ~/.npm + key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }} - name: Install dependencies run: npm install Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: While caching node modules can improve performance, the current setup may still function adequately without it, making this a minor enhancement.	6

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)

.github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml (3)

Line range hint 2-13: Consider removing redundant trigger events

The workflow is configured to run on both pull_request and pull_request_target events. This could lead to duplicate runs for the same changes. Consider using only pull_request_target as it's designed specifically for handling fork contributions securely while providing access to secrets.

 on:
   push:
     branches:
       - main
-  pull_request:
-    types: [opened, synchronize, reopened]
   pull_request_target:
     types: [opened, synchronize, reopened]

---

Line range hint 30-46: Add missing workflow_dispatch trigger

The conditional includes workflow_dispatch event, but this event type isn't defined in the workflow triggers. This means the manual trigger condition will never be met.

 on:
   push:
     branches:
       - main
   pull_request_target:
     types: [opened, synchronize, reopened]
+  workflow_dispatch:

---

Line range hint 15-24: Optimize workflow performance and consistency

Consider these improvements for better workflow efficiency and reliability:

1. Specify Node.js version explicitly
2. Implement dependency caching

   steps:
     - uses: actions/checkout@v4
       with:
         fetch-depth: 0
 
+    - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
+      with:
+        node-version: '18'
+        cache: 'npm'
+
     - name: Install dependencies
       run: npm install

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 95bbda6 and b07b3dd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml (1 hunks)

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

3:00AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
3:00AM INF 17 commits scanned.
3:00AM INF scan completed in 75.6ms
3:00AM INF no leaks found

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud