Update sonar-project.properties +semver: minor

[guibranco]

User description

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

ℹ Additional Information

---

Description

• Added configuration for JavaScript code coverage reporting in SonarQube.
• This change enhances the project's ability to track test coverage metrics.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Configuration changes	sonar-project.properties Update SonarQube configuration for JavaScript coverage      sonar-project.properties Added sonar.javascript.lcov.reportPaths to specify the coverage report path. No other changes were made to the file. +2/-1

---

💡 Penify usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced a new property for JavaScript code coverage reporting.

• Bug Fixes

  • Ensured the path for the LCOV report is correctly specified for improved analysis.

[code-genius-code-coverage]

The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new property to the sonar-project.properties file, specifically adding the line sonar.javascript.lcov.reportPaths=./coverage/lcov.info. This addition specifies the location of the LCOV report for JavaScript code coverage, enabling SonarQube to analyze coverage metrics effectively. The existing property sonar.organization=apibr remains unchanged.

Changes

File	Change Summary
sonar-project.properties	Added property sonar.javascript.lcov.reportPaths=./coverage/lcov.info

Possibly related PRs

• Feature/add workflows #11: The changes in the sonar-project.properties file in this PR are directly related to the modifications made in the same file in PR Feature/add workflows #11, which also involves properties for SonarQube integration.

Suggested labels

size/S, Review effort [1-5]: 4

Suggested reviewers

• gstraccini

Poem

In the land of code so bright,
A path for coverage took flight.
With LCOV now in sight,
SonarQube will delight,
Metrics clear, all is right! 🐇✨

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@penify-dev[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 5 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0554607 and 46b2f65.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, consisting of a single configuration line addition.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Verify the validity of the coverage report path Ensure that the sonar.javascript.lcov.reportPaths property points to a valid path that exists in your project structure to avoid issues during the analysis. sonar-project.properties [2-3] sonar.organization=apibr -sonar.javascript.lcov.reportPaths=./coverage/lcov.info +sonar.javascript.lcov.reportPaths=./coverage/lcov.info # Ensure this path is valid Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: While it's good practice to ensure paths are valid, the suggestion does not address a critical issue in the code itself, as it is more of a general recommendation rather than a specific bug fix or improvement.	5

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

3:26AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
3:26AM INF 16 commits scanned.
3:26AM INF scan completed in 76.5ms
3:26AM INF no leaks found

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud