Update deploy.yml

[guibranco]

User description

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

ℹ Additional Information

---

Description

• Enhanced the deployment workflow by updating the local directory path.
• Changed the deployment directory from build/ to dist/ to reflect the new build output location.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Configuration changes	deploy.yml Update Deployment Configuration for Release                            .github/workflows/deploy.yml Updated the local directory path for deployment. Changed localDir from build/ to dist/. +1/-1

---

💡 Penify usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the workflow configuration to change the directory for potential file uploads from "build/" to "dist/".

[code-genius-code-coverage]

The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the workflow configuration in .github/workflows/deploy.yml, specifically updating the localDir parameter in the commented-out FTP upload step from "build/" to "dist/". This change indicates a new directory for file uploads while keeping the upload step inactive. The overall structure of the workflow remains unchanged, consisting of two main jobs: build and create_release, which handle project building and release creation, respectively.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/deploy.yml	Updated localDir parameter in commented-out FTP upload step from "build/" to "dist/".

Possibly related PRs

• Feature/add workflows #11: The main PR modifies the localDir parameter in the FTP upload step, which is part of the deployment workflows introduced in this PR, indicating a direct connection to the changes made in the workflow configurations.

Suggested labels

size/S, Review effort [1-5]: 4

Suggested reviewers

• gstraccini

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
A change was made in a clever way.
From "build" to "dist," the path now leads,
For uploads to flourish, fulfilling our needs.
With hops of joy, we celebrate this feat,
As our workflow dances to a new, sweet beat! 🐇✨

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@penify-dev[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 28 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7fd95b2 and 3f685a5.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	1, because the changes are straightforward and involve a simple path update in the deployment configuration.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Security	Review commented-out credentials for security best practices Ensure that the commented-out lines for host, user, and password are reviewed for security best practices before deployment. .github/workflows/deploy.yml [53-55] -# host: ${{ secrets.FTP_SERVER }} -# user: ${{ secrets.FTP_USERNAME }} -# password: ${{ secrets.FTP_PASSWORD }} +# host: ${{ secrets.FTP_SERVER }} # Ensure this is secure +# user: ${{ secrets.FTP_USERNAME }} # Ensure this is secure +# password: ${{ secrets.FTP_PASSWORD }} # Ensure this is secure Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: This suggestion is relevant as it highlights the importance of reviewing commented-out credentials for security, which is crucial before deployment. It addresses a potential security concern effectively.	8

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

3:36AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
3:36AM INF 18 commits scanned.
3:36AM INF scan completed in 75.1ms
3:36AM INF no leaks found

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud