Feature/add workflows

[guibranco]

User description

📑 Description

Add GitHub workflows

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

ℹ Additional Information

---

Description

• Introduced multiple GitHub workflows for CI/CD processes.
• Added a pre-commit hook to enforce branch naming conventions.
• Configured Dependabot for automatic dependency updates.
• Implemented SonarCloud for code quality analysis.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

9 files pre-commit Add pre-commit hook for branch name validation                      .githooks/pre-commit Added a pre-commit hook for branch name validation. Ensures branch names follow a specific regex pattern. +16/-0    dependabot.yml Add Dependabot configuration                                                          .github/dependabot.yml Configured Dependabot for npm and GitHub Actions. Set weekly update schedule and assignees. +28/-0    build.yml Update build workflow configuration                                            .github/workflows/build.yml Updated build workflow to include fetch-depth configuration. Ensured proper setup for Node.js. +2/-0      deploy.yml Add build and deploy workflow                                                        .github/workflows/deploy.yml Created a new workflow for build and deployment via FTP. Includes steps for versioning, building, and testing. +77/-0    infisical-secrets-check.yml Add Infisical secrets check workflow                                          .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml Added a workflow for checking secrets using Infisical. Configured to run on pull requests and manually. +24/-0    size-label.yml Add PR size labeling workflow                                                        .github/workflows/size-label.yml Implemented a workflow to label pull requests based on size. Configured to run on pull request events. +27/-0    snorkell-auto-documentation.yml Update documentation generation workflow                                  .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml Updated documentation generation workflow. Ensured it runs on the main branch. +6/-6      sonar-cloud.yml Add SonarCloud analysis workflow                                                  .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml Added SonarCloud analysis workflow for code quality checks. Configured to run on push and pull request events. +44/-0    GitVersion.yml Configure GitVersion for CI/CD                                                      GitVersion.yml Configured GitVersion for continuous delivery. Set workflow mode to GitHubFlow. +2/-0

---

💡 Penify usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

• New Features

  • Introduced a pre-commit hook to enforce branch naming conventions.
  • Added Dependabot configuration for automated dependency updates.
  • Implemented a new deployment workflow for automated builds and FTP deployment.
  • Introduced workflows for secrets scanning and pull request size labeling.
  • Added a SonarCloud analysis workflow for code quality checks.

• Bug Fixes

  • Adjusted indentation in the documentation workflow for consistency.

• Configuration Changes

  • Established GitVersion configuration for continuous delivery practices.

[code-genius-code-coverage]

The files' contents are under analysis for test generation.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several changes to the GitHub repository, including the addition of new workflows for deployment, secrets checking, size labeling, and SonarCloud analysis. A pre-commit hook is implemented to enforce branch naming conventions, while Dependabot configuration is established for package updates. The build workflow is modified to fetch the full repository history. Additionally, a new GitVersion configuration is added to support continuous delivery practices.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.githooks/pre-commit	New pre-commit hook script to validate branch names and run linting.
.github/dependabot.yml	New Dependabot configuration for "npm" and "github-actions" with update strategies.
.github/workflows/build.yml	Added fetch-depth: 0 parameter in the Checkout repository step.
.github/workflows/deploy.yml	New workflow for automated build and deployment via FTP, triggered on main branch pushes and manual events.
.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml	New workflow for secrets checking, triggered by workflow_dispatch and pull_request.
.github/workflows/size-label.yml	New workflow to label pull requests based on size, triggered by pull_request, pull_request_target, and manual events.
.github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml	Indentation adjustments in the Documentation job; no functional changes.
.github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml	New workflow for code quality analysis using SonarCloud, triggered on specific branch and pull request events.
GitVersion.yml	New workflow configuration indicating GitHubFlow/v1 and ContinuousDelivery mode.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHub
    participant CI/CD
    participant SonarCloud

    User->>GitHub: Push code
    GitHub->>CI/CD: Trigger workflows
    CI/CD->>CI/CD: Run build
    CI/CD->>SonarCloud: Analyze code quality
    SonarCloud-->>CI/CD: Return analysis results
    CI/CD-->>GitHub: Deploy code

Loading

🐰 "In the garden of code, we hop with glee,
Branch names in order, as neat as can be!
With workflows aplenty, our tasks are a breeze,
Deployments and secrets, we handle with ease.
So let’s celebrate changes, both big and small,
A tidy repo, we cherish it all!" 🐇✨

Possibly related PRs

• Feature/add workflows #11: The main PR introduces a pre-commit hook for branch naming conventions, which is part of the broader set of enhancements in the retrieved PR that also includes the implementation of a pre-commit hook.

Suggested labels

size/S

Suggested reviewers

• gstraccini

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@penify-dev[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 14 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 36afb74 and bf06dd7.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

2:48AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
2:48AM INF 10 commits scanned.
2:48AM INF scan completed in 74.6ms
2:48AM INF no leaks found

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	4, because the PR introduces multiple GitHub workflows and configuration files, which require careful examination to ensure they function correctly and adhere to best practices.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	Configuration Overhead: The addition of multiple workflows may introduce complexity in maintenance. Ensure that each workflow is necessary and well-documented.
	Linting Step: The pre-commit hook runs npm run lint, but it is unclear if this command is defined in the package.json. Ensure that the linting command is correctly set up to avoid confusion.
🔒 Security concerns	No

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Specify a version for the SonarCloud action to ensure stability Consider specifying a version tag for the SonarCloud GitHub action to avoid unexpected changes due to updates. .github/workflows/sonar-cloud.yml [31] -uses: SonarSource/sonarcloud-github-action@master +uses: SonarSource/[email protected] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Specifying a version for the SonarCloud action is a best practice that ensures stability and prevents unexpected changes, making this a highly relevant suggestion.	9
Possible bug	Add error handling to the build command in the workflow Ensure that the run commands are properly handling errors, as failing commands could cause the workflow to succeed incorrectly. .github/workflows/deploy.yml [45] -run: npm run build +run: npm run build || exit 1 Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: This suggestion addresses a potential bug by adding error handling to the build command, which is crucial for ensuring the workflow behaves correctly.	8
Possible issue	Improve the regex pattern for branch name validation Consider using a more specific regex pattern for branch names to avoid potential conflicts with unintended names. .githooks/pre-commit [6] -valid_branch_regex="^(penify|gitauto|dependabot|feature|fix|docs|style|refactor|perf|hotfix|test|chore|create)(\/[a-zA-Z0-9#._-]+)+$" +valid_branch_regex="^(penify|gitauto|dependabot|feature|fix|docs|style|refactor|perf|hotfix|test|chore|create)(\/[a-zA-Z0-9#._-]+)?$" Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion improves the regex pattern for branch name validation, which can help avoid conflicts, but the original regex is already fairly robust.	7
Security	Limit the permissions for the secrets check job to enhance security Ensure that the permissions for the secrets check job are limited to only what is necessary for security reasons. .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml [14-16] permissions: contents: read - pull-requests: write + pull-requests: read Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: While limiting permissions is important for security, the original permissions may already be acceptable for the job's requirements, making this a minor improvement.	6