Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rely on docker-image-cleaner in external repo #1391

Merged

Conversation

consideRatio
Copy link
Member

@consideRatio consideRatio commented Sep 22, 2021

@yuvipanda and I worked to migrate the image-cleaner code and docker image from this repo to its own project in jupyterhub/docker-image-cleaner. It helps reduce the complexity of this repo that includes a lot of parts that could be split into smaller more comprehensible pieces.

With this PR, I remove the code the image cleaner code that now lives in the jupyterhub/docker-image-cleaner git repo.

@yuvipanda
Copy link
Collaborator

image

Nice :D

Copy link
Collaborator

@yuvipanda yuvipanda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is great, but I want to give others who aren't already involved in this decision a chance to weigh in before I hit merge. I'll wait a week maybe?

/cc @sgibson91 @betatim @manics @minrk :)

@manics
Copy link
Member

manics commented Sep 30, 2021

I haven't tested it, but assuming it works I can't think of any reason not to do this 😄

@betatim
Copy link
Member

betatim commented Oct 1, 2021

Fine for me. As always my main thoughts are around "what could break if we do this?" and "is this backwards compatible?"

@consideRatio
Copy link
Member Author

Given this broad approval, I'll go for a merge, and later today try go for a mybinder.org deploy and steward this change all the way there.

@consideRatio
Copy link
Member Author

This PR is successfully deployed all the way to mybinder.org-deploy. It had to be complemented with #1417.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants