-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 356
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pin lalsuite version and fix error in pycbc_plot_singles_vs_params #4997
Pin lalsuite version and fix error in pycbc_plot_singles_vs_params #4997
Conversation
03fad85
to
503488e
Compare
This is testing the bugfix now |
.github/workflows/basic-tests.yml
Outdated
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ jobs: | |||
cd lalsuite-extra | |||
git lfs pull -I "data/lalsimulation/SEOBNRv2ROM_*.dat" | |||
git lfs pull -I "data/lalsimulation/*ChirpTime*.dat" | |||
git lfs pull -I "data/lalsimulation/SEOBNRv4ROM_v2.0.hdf5" | |||
git lfs pull -I "data/lalsimulation/SEOBNRv4ROM_v*.hdf5" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Curious about this. Looking at the Gitlab repo, that file has not been changed in 8 years (!).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup, looking deeper in the errors, it seems to be wanting v3.0 of that file, and it doesn't exist that I can see
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In fact it could be this change that caused the error
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wait, is this on a lalsuite release? How did that slip through??
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Blocking the latest lalsuite version is a viable workaround (latest tests), but I know that we generally don't like blocking versions of dependencies.
It is not planned for the required files to be on lalsuite-extra, so we will need to access an alternative.
I think blocking that version for now until the new location is decided, and then we can unblock it once we point to the new location
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pinning lalsuite to less than this version might be needed temporarily (don't block the release, pin to less than)
This was a testing PR for some error in
pycbc_plot_singles_vs_params
, but I identified and fixed an error with lalsuite during the testing, so it is now both fixes.The changes are discussed in the comments (and linked issue), but the summary is:
The matplotlib version testing failed when 3.10 was used, as it did not understand semantic versioning, this has now been added
The lalsuite version mentioned requires a data file which is not public, and so we pin to before that version until the data file is public and we can point to it
Fixes #4993