-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 356
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pin lalsuite version and fix error in pycbc_plot_singles_vs_params #4997
Merged
GarethCabournDavies
merged 8 commits into
gwastro:master
from
GarethCabournDavies:plot_singles_bug
Dec 20, 2024
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
373dc11
Test printing z before it undergoes max()
GarethCabournDavies cfb98d1
Add output for relevant files needed to recreate job
GarethCabournDavies 7ed83cb
just upload everything for this test
GarethCabournDavies 503488e
Fix
GarethCabournDavies f37aa71
SEOBNRV4 ROM version has updated
GarethCabournDavies 2446d84
Test blocking latest lalsuite version
GarethCabournDavies d531484
less than, not block
GarethCabournDavies 7032e92
Adding comment for why this is pinned
GarethCabournDavies File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Curious about this. Looking at the Gitlab repo, that file has not been changed in 8 years (!).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup, looking deeper in the errors, it seems to be wanting v3.0 of that file, and it doesn't exist that I can see
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In fact it could be this change that caused the error
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wait, is this on a lalsuite release? How did that slip through??
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Blocking the latest lalsuite version is a viable workaround (latest tests), but I know that we generally don't like blocking versions of dependencies.
It is not planned for the required files to be on lalsuite-extra, so we will need to access an alternative.
I think blocking that version for now until the new location is decided, and then we can unblock it once we point to the new location
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pinning lalsuite to less than this version might be needed temporarily (don't block the release, pin to less than)