Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: enable bridgeless #48160

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

WoLewicki
Copy link
Contributor

@WoLewicki WoLewicki commented Aug 28, 2024

Details

PR enabling bridgeless mode in the App. This PR can affects the App as a whole, so should require full regression testing.

PRs for introduced patches:

Fixed Issues

$ #48163
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

This comment has been minimized.

@WoLewicki WoLewicki marked this pull request as ready for review October 4, 2024 13:02
@WoLewicki WoLewicki requested a review from a team as a code owner October 4, 2024 13:02
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from fedirjh and roryabraham and removed request for a team October 4, 2024 13:02
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 4, 2024

@fedirjh @roryabraham One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2024

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

roryabraham commented Oct 4, 2024

react-native-keyboard-controller: The code is already there from 1.13.0 so it just needs a bump and we can remove the patch then.

So let's do this before we merge this PR, rather than creating a patch that has to be cleaned up after

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

Created #50253

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

react-native-firebase: We have a dirty workaround and Meta is already working on a better solution after I reported the problem to them. We won't make a PR with it since it's better to wait for it to be fixed in core.

Can you link to an upstream issue plz? 🙇🏼

@WoLewicki
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can you link to an upstream issue plz? 🙇🏼

Done.

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Oct 7, 2024

@WoLewicki On iOS native, I cannot change the profile avatar or select an attachment in composer

CleanShot.2024-10-07.at.15.12.39.mp4
CleanShot.2024-10-07.at.14.56.32.mp4

When creating a distance request, the composer is shinking :

Screenshot 2024-10-07 at 3 21 56 PM
CleanShot.2024-10-07.at.15.09.10.mp4

I got the warning several times when I created a new expenses

Screenshot 2024-10-07 at 3 04 38 PM

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Oct 7, 2024

@WoLewicki On android, when sending a new message, the app crashes with this error:

Screenshot 2024-10-07 at 4 10 12 PM

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Oct 7, 2024

On Android: When you try to create a new expense, the App crashes with this error, there were other warnings errors as well :

Screenshot 2024-10-07 at 4 14 42 PM Screenshot 2024-10-07 at 4 13 58 PM Screenshot 2024-10-07 at 4 14 07 PM Screenshot 2024-10-07 at 4 14 54 PM Screenshot 2024-10-07 at 4 15 01 PM

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Oct 7, 2024

On Android: When you create a scan expense, the App crashes with these errors:

Screenshot 2024-10-07 at 4 19 38 PM Screenshot 2024-10-07 at 4 19 48 PM Screenshot 2024-10-07 at 4 20 04 PM

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Oct 7, 2024

When you navigate to troubleshoot page, the app will crash with this error :

Screenshot 2024-10-07 at 4 35 10 PM

@WoLewicki
Copy link
Contributor Author

Seems like the event system on bridgeless mode on Android is far more strict regarding the event names. I'll fix those issues one by one, thanks @fedirjh !

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2024

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
❌ FAILED ❌ ❌ FAILED ❌
The QR code can't be generated, because the android build failed The QR code can't be generated, because the iOS build failed
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
❌ FAILED ❌ ❌ FAILED ❌
The QR code can't be generated, because the Desktop build failed The QR code can't be generated, because the web build failed

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

Copy link
Contributor

@hannojg
Copy link
Contributor

hannojg commented Oct 10, 2024

hey @WoLewicki will you open PR for all patches in the repositories upstream? I could help with the vision camera patch if you'd like to!

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@WoLewicki @hannojg yeah we should definitely try to follow up with those so we can keep track of all of the patches

@WoLewicki
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, sure I'll do. Thanks @hannojg , will ping you with any problems 😅 Also, is there a reason why you didn't modify all the needed places for onClear callback in RN core patch? I mean this one with the changes I needed to add: https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/48160/files#diff-6220375a6bf22d664fd3eb2f7b023728fc40b97934d8731328aca0efadaee0b9. Or was it just an overlook?

@hannojg
Copy link
Contributor

hannojg commented Oct 10, 2024

Also, is there a reason why you didn't modify all the needed places for onClear callback in RN core patch?

Is it missing in some of the view components javascript spec? i might have skipped doing that, due to the behaviour of w/o bridgeless reading it from the view manager. If so, feel free to add it everywhere necessary, yes!

@WoLewicki
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, I did extend your patch already, thanks for clarification!

@WoLewicki
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hannojg here is the PR to react-native-vision-camera: mrousavy/react-native-vision-camera#3240. It works on old arch, and I tried to test it on new arch, but the example app does not compile there 😞

@hannojg
Copy link
Contributor

hannojg commented Oct 11, 2024

Nw, i will test the PR (probably going to merge it and then add anything else necessary to make new arch work, so nw, i am gonna take it from there 😊 👍 )

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@WoLewicki how is this looking, should I create a new build and should Fedi do another round of testing or should we wait for a bit?

@WoLewicki
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let's do another build @mountiny, it should be ready for testing.

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

New build running here

Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Oct 14, 2024

@WoLewicki It tests well on iOS and Android 🚀 . Only still getting this warning on iOS :

Screenshot 2024-10-14 at 11 23 22 AM

@WoLewicki
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fedirjh hmm I don't know where it can come from. But at the same time it does not change anything in how the app is working yes?

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Oct 14, 2024

But at the same time it does not change anything in how the app is working yes?

Yes the app is still working as expected.

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Oct 14, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
CleanShot.2024-10-14.at.10.55.19-trimmed.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome Screenshot 2024-10-14 at 11 04 03 AM Screenshot 2024-10-14 at 11 05 27 AM
iOS: Native
CleanShot.2024-10-14.at.11.24.01.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
CleanShot.2024-10-14.at.11.34.34.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

CleanShot 2024-10-14 at 11 53 52

MacOS: Desktop

CleanShot 2024-10-14 at 11 52 39

Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh fedirjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@WoLewicki Are there some performance benefits we could already measure and expect from this PR?

@WoLewicki
Copy link
Contributor Author

I tried to look at the output of Reassure Performance Tests job from this PR but I cannot find the results for the most interesting metric for us, being some kind of app TTI. Should I look somewhere else for it? I would restrain from getting those locally.

@hannojg
Copy link
Contributor

hannojg commented Oct 18, 2024

@mountiny we could run the e2e tests, that gives us many interesting numbers (TTIs, FPS, Memory, CPU etc)

@WoLewicki
Copy link
Contributor Author

I wouldn't expect enormous gains, but some at least due to Static View Configs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants