ci(test): Refactor CI workflow and separate lint jobs #115
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes include a comprehensive restructuring of the CI workflow in Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
yamadashy
force-pushed
the
feature/improve-ci
branch
from
3dae008
to
6afc0c9
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
package.json (2)
17-17: Good addition of a separate Biome linting script.The
lint-biomescript isolates the Biome linting process, which is a good practice for modularity. The--writeflag allows Biome to automatically fix issues where possible.Consider adding a
lint-biome:checkscript without the--writeflag for CI environments where you might want to fail the build instead of auto-fixing issues:"lint-biome:check": "biome check"
19-19: Good addition of a separate secret linting script.The
lint-secretlintscript isolates secret linting, which is crucial for preventing accidental commit of sensitive information. This is an important security practice.Consider optimizing the file pattern to exclude unnecessary directories or files:
"lint-secretlint": "secretlint '**/*' '!**/node_modules/**' '!**/dist/**'"This will improve performance by skipping
node_modulesanddistdirectories, which typically don't need secret scanning..github/workflows/ci.yml (4)
35-46: Addition of lint-secretlint job improves security checks.The new lint-secretlint job is an excellent addition to the workflow, helping to prevent accidental exposure of secrets in the codebase. The job structure is consistent with other linting jobs, which is good for maintainability.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the secretlint check for better documentation:
lint-secretlint: name: Lint Secretlint # Add a comment here explaining the purpose of secretlint, e.g.: # Run secretlint to detect potential secrets or sensitive information in the codebase runs-on: ubuntu-24.04 # ... rest of the job configuration
59-67: Addition of check-npm-audit job enhances security checks.The new check-npm-audit job is a valuable addition to the workflow, helping to identify known vulnerabilities in project dependencies. This proactive security measure can prevent potential issues before they make it into production.
Consider adding a step to fail the CI if high severity vulnerabilities are found. This can be achieved by modifying the npm audit command:
check-npm-audit: name: Check npm audit runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version-file: .tool-versions - name: Run npm audit run: npm audit --audit-level=highThis change will cause the job to fail if any high severity vulnerabilities are detected, providing an extra layer of security in your CI process.
69-74: Addition of check-typos job improves code quality.The new check-typos job is a great addition to the workflow. It helps catch typos in the codebase, which can improve overall code quality and documentation accuracy. The use of a specific version (v1.25.0) of the crate-ci/typos action ensures reproducibility of the checks.
Consider adding configuration for the typos check to ignore certain files or directories if needed. You can do this by creating a
typos.tomlfile in your repository root and referencing it in the action:check-typos: name: Check typos runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: crate-ci/[email protected] with: config: ./typos.tomlThis allows for more fine-grained control over the typo checking process, especially in large codebases where certain files or directories might need to be excluded.
Line range hint
76-140: Improvements to test, test-coverage, and build-and-run jobs enhance workflow efficiency.The changes to these jobs, including renaming for clarity and removing dependencies on the lint job, are positive improvements. These modifications allow for parallel execution of jobs, potentially reducing the overall workflow execution time.
For the build-and-run job, consider adding a step to cache the build output. This can speed up subsequent runs of the workflow. Here's an example of how you could implement this:
build-and-run: name: Build and run # ... existing configuration ... steps: # ... existing steps ... - name: Cache build output uses: actions/cache@v3 with: path: | dist .next/cache # Generate a new cache whenever packages or source files change. key: ${{ runner.os }}-nextjs-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}-${{ hashFiles('**.[jt]s', '**.[jt]sx') }} # If source files changed but packages didn't, rebuild from a prior cache. restore-keys: | ${{ runner.os }}-nextjs-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }}- - run: npm run build # ... rest of the jobThis caching step can significantly reduce build times in subsequent runs if the source code hasn't changed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (5 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
package.json (3)
16-16: Excellent refactoring of the lint script!The updated
lintscript improves modularity and maintainability by separating different linting tasks into individual scripts. This change allows for more flexible execution of linting processes while maintaining the same overall functionality.
18-18: Good addition of a separate TypeScript linting script.The
lint-tsscript isolates TypeScript type checking, which is crucial for catching type-related issues early in the development process. The use of--noEmitflag ensures that no output files are generated during the type check, which is appropriate for a linting task.
16-19: Overall excellent refactoring of the linting scripts!The changes in this file significantly improve the structure and modularity of the linting process. By separating different linting tasks into individual scripts, you've enhanced clarity, maintainability, and flexibility in the CI process. This aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of refactoring the CI workflow and separating lint jobs.
These changes will make it easier to:
- Run specific linting tasks independently
- Maintain and update linting configurations
- Potentially parallelize linting jobs in CI pipelines
Great work on improving the project's development workflow!
.github/workflows/ci.yml (4)
1-1: Workflow name change is appropriate.The change from "Test" to "CI" better reflects the comprehensive nature of the workflow, which now includes various linting, testing, and building tasks.
11-21: Lint-biome job improvements are beneficial.The renaming of the job to "lint-biome" and the addition of the
git diffcheck after running the linter are positive changes. They provide more specificity and ensure that the linting process doesn't introduce unexpected modifications.
23-33: Addition of lint-ts job enhances TypeScript-specific checks.The new lint-ts job is a valuable addition to the workflow. It allows for focused TypeScript linting, which can catch type-related issues early in the development process. The job structure is consistent with other jobs in the workflow, which is good for maintainability.
47-58: Addition of lint-renovate-config job ensures valid Renovate configuration.The new lint-renovate-config job is a valuable addition to the workflow. It validates the Renovate configuration, which is crucial for maintaining accurate and up-to-date dependencies. The use of
npxto run the validator is an appropriate choice for this type of task.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #115 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 76.57% 76.57%
=======================================
Files 36 36
Lines 1665 1665
Branches 269 269
=======================================
Hits 1275 1275
Misses 390 390 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
yamadashy
force-pushed
the
feature/improve-ci
branch
from
6afc0c9
to
99fbab7
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Modifications