Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(package): Fix secretlint command #124

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2024
Merged

fix(package): Fix secretlint command #124

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

yamadashy
Copy link
Owner

@yamadashy yamadashy commented Oct 14, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced CI process with matrix strategies for lint-secretlint, test, and build-and-run jobs, allowing execution across multiple operating systems and Node.js versions for improved flexibility and coverage.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the CI workflow configuration in .github/workflows/ci.yml to implement matrix strategies for various jobs. The lint-secretlint job is now capable of running on multiple operating systems (Ubuntu, Windows, macOS). Similarly, the test and build-and-run jobs have been updated to utilize matrix strategies for both operating systems and multiple Node.js versions (16.x, 18.x, 20.x, 22.x). This change enhances the flexibility and coverage of the CI process while maintaining the existing job structures.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci.yml Updated lint-secretlint, test, and build-and-run jobs to use matrix strategies for OS and Node.js versions.

Possibly related PRs

  • ci(test): Refactor CI workflow and separate lint jobs #115: The changes in the main PR regarding the lint-secretlint job in .github/workflows/ci.yml are directly related to the restructuring and addition of the lint-secretlint job in the retrieved PR, which also modifies the CI workflow configuration.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@yamadashy yamadashy marked this pull request as draft October 14, 2024 00:29
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (4)

37-40: Approve matrix strategy for lint-secretlint job with a suggestion.

The introduction of a matrix strategy for the lint-secretlint job is a good improvement. It increases test coverage across different operating systems, which can help identify potential OS-specific issues.

However, consider if running secretlint on all operating systems is necessary. If secretlint behavior is consistent across platforms, you might want to limit this to a single OS to optimize CI runtime and resource usage.

If you find that secretlint results are consistent across OSes, consider limiting the matrix to a single OS:

strategy:
  matrix:
    os: [ubuntu-latest]

Line range hint 89-91: Approve matrix strategy for test job with a suggestion.

The introduction of a matrix strategy for the test job is an excellent improvement. It ensures that your tests run across multiple Node.js versions and operating systems, significantly increasing your test coverage.

However, I noticed that you're still testing against Node.js 16.x, which is nearing its end-of-life (EOL) in September 2023.

Consider removing Node.js 16.x from the matrix to focus on currently supported and future versions:

strategy:
  matrix:
    os: [ubuntu-latest, windows-latest, macos-latest]
    node-version: [18.x, 20.x, 22.x]

This change will help streamline your CI process while still maintaining broad coverage.

Also applies to: 93-94, 96-97


Line range hint 134-136: Approve matrix strategy for build-and-run job with suggestions.

The matrix strategy for the build-and-run job is a great addition. It ensures that your project builds and runs correctly across multiple Node.js versions and operating systems.

However, there are a couple of points to consider:

  1. As mentioned earlier, Node.js 16.x is nearing its end-of-life.
  2. The current setup generates artifacts for each combination of OS and Node.js version, which could lead to excessive storage usage.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Remove Node.js 16.x from the matrix:
strategy:
  matrix:
    os: [ubuntu-latest, windows-latest, macos-latest]
    node-version: [18.x, 20.x, 22.x]
  1. Limit artifact uploads to reduce storage usage. For example, you could upload artifacts only for the latest Node.js version:
- name: Upload build artifact
  uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
  if: matrix.node-version == '22.x'
  with:
    name: repopack-output-${{ matrix.os }}-${{ matrix.node-version }}.txt
    path: repopack-output.txt

These changes will help optimize your CI process and resource usage while still maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Also applies to: 138-139, 141-142, 149-152


Line range hint 1-152: Overall workflow improvements with room for optimization.

The changes to this workflow file significantly enhance the CI process by introducing matrix strategies for the lint-secretlint, test, and build-and-run jobs. This approach ensures better coverage across different operating systems and Node.js versions, which is crucial for identifying environment-specific issues early in the development process.

However, there are a few areas where the workflow could be further optimized:

  1. Consider the necessity of running lint-secretlint across all operating systems.
  2. Remove Node.js 16.x from the test and build matrices, as it's nearing end-of-life.
  3. Optimize artifact upload strategy to reduce storage usage.

These optimizations would help balance comprehensive testing with efficient use of CI resources.

To further improve this workflow, consider:

  1. Implementing caching for npm dependencies to speed up job execution.
  2. Adding a job to automatically update the package-lock.json file if needed.
  3. Implementing parallel job execution where possible to reduce overall workflow duration.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a0b2c4 and a734e1d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.57%. Comparing base (29789bf) to head (ced8598).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #124   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.57%   76.57%           
=======================================
  Files          36       36           
  Lines        1665     1665           
  Branches      269      269           
=======================================
  Hits         1275     1275           
  Misses        390      390           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@yamadashy yamadashy marked this pull request as ready for review October 14, 2024 00:39
@yamadashy yamadashy changed the title patch: Try running secretlint fix(package): Fix secretlint command Oct 14, 2024
@yamadashy yamadashy merged commit b50e7c3 into main Oct 14, 2024
36 checks passed
@yamadashy yamadashy deleted the fix/lint-on-windows branch October 14, 2024 01:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant