Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Official Kinetic support? #21

Closed
nstiurca opened this issue Aug 9, 2016 · 10 comments
Closed

Official Kinetic support? #21

nstiurca opened this issue Aug 9, 2016 · 10 comments

Comments

@nstiurca
Copy link

nstiurca commented Aug 9, 2016

Hi,

I'm wondering if you have any plans for official ROS Kinetic support (ie, binaries). I was able to compile this code from source with absolutely 0 problems under Ubuntu 16.04 + ROS Kinetic.

Thanks.

@piyushk
Copy link
Member

piyushk commented Aug 9, 2016

@nstiurca We plan on figuring out Kinetic binaries for all our packages over the next few months. Pull requests will be appreciated.

@jack-oquin
Copy link
Member

xref: utexas-bwi/segbot#77

@jack-oquin
Copy link
Member

I'll probably work on this soon.

@jack-oquin
Copy link
Member

I'm finally working on this again.

It builds with Kinetic on Xenial, but with some annoying warnings:

Warnings   << eband_local_planner:cmake /home/joq/ros/ws/logs/eband_local_planner/build.cmake.000.log                                                                          
CMake Warning at /opt/ros/kinetic/share/cmake_modules/cmake/Modules/FindEigen.cmake:62 (message):
  The FindEigen.cmake Module in the cmake_modules package is deprecated.

  Please use the FindEigen3.cmake Module provided with Eigen.  Change
  instances of find_package(Eigen) to find_package(Eigen3).  Check the
  FindEigen3.cmake Module for the resulting CMake variable names.

Call Stack (most recent call first):
  CMakeLists.txt:20 (find_package)


cd /home/joq/ros/ws/build/eband_local_planner; catkin build --get-env eband_local_planner | catkin env -si  /usr/bin/cmake /home/joq/ros/ws/src/eband_local_planner --no-warn-unused-cli -DCATKIN_DEVEL_PREFIX=/home/joq/ros/ws/devel -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/home/joq/ros/ws/install; cd -
...............................................................................................................................................................................
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Warnings   << eband_local_planner:make /home/joq/ros/ws/logs/eband_local_planner/build.make.000.log                                                                            
In file included from /opt/ros/kinetic/include/ros/ros.h:40:0,
                 from /home/joq/ros/ws/src/eband_local_planner/include/eband_local_planner/eband_trajectory_controller.h:41,
                 from /home/joq/ros/ws/src/eband_local_planner/src/eband_trajectory_controller.cpp:38:
/home/joq/ros/ws/src/eband_local_planner/src/eband_trajectory_controller.cpp: In member function ‘bool eband_local_planner::EBandTrajectoryCtrl::getTwistDifferentialDrive(geometry_msgs::Twist&, bool&)’:
/opt/ros/kinetic/include/ros/console.h:346:176: warning: too many arguments for format [-Wformat-extra-args]
     ::ros::console::print(filter, __rosconsole_define_location__loc.logger_, __rosconsole_define_location__loc.level_, __FILE__, __LINE__, __ROSCONSOLE_FUNCTION__, __VA_ARGS__)
                                                                                                                                                                                ^
/opt/ros/kinetic/include/ros/console.h:349:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘ROSCONSOLE_PRINT_AT_LOCATION_WITH_FILTER’
     ROSCONSOLE_PRINT_AT_LOCATION_WITH_FILTER(0, __VA_ARGS__)
     ^
/opt/ros/kinetic/include/ros/console.h:379:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘ROSCONSOLE_PRINT_AT_LOCATION’
       ROSCONSOLE_PRINT_AT_LOCATION(__VA_ARGS__); \
       ^
/opt/ros/kinetic/include/ros/console.h:561:35: note: in expansion of macro ‘ROS_LOG_COND’
 #define ROS_LOG(level, name, ...) ROS_LOG_COND(true, level, name, __VA_ARGS__)
                                   ^
/opt/ros/kinetic/include/rosconsole/macros_generated.h:58:24: note: in expansion of macro ‘ROS_LOG’
 #define ROS_DEBUG(...) ROS_LOG(::ros::console::levels::Debug, ROSCONSOLE_DEFAULT_NAME, __VA_ARGS__)
                        ^
/home/joq/ros/ws/src/eband_local_planner/src/eband_trajectory_controller.cpp:309:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘ROS_DEBUG’
         ROS_DEBUG("Performing in place rotation for start (diff): %f", bubble_diff.angular.z, robot_cmd.angular.z);
         ^
cd /home/joq/ros/ws/build/eband_local_planner; catkin build --get-env eband_local_planner | catkin env -si  /usr/bin/make --jobserver-fds=6,7 -j; cd -

@jack-oquin
Copy link
Member

With commit 2f683a3, it compiles cleanly on Kinetic, but fails on Indigo, which apparently needs to use Eigen and not Eigen3.

@piyushk
Copy link
Member

piyushk commented Jul 2, 2017

Thanks a lot for working on this Jack! I'm going to be on vacation for a couple of weeks in a few days, but I can help you with this once I get back.

@jack-oquin
Copy link
Member

Commit 65035f3 makes it conditional. That works on Indigo, but throws a warning.

I figure that's better than forking a separate indigo_devel branch. Hopefully, we won't need to release on Indigo again, so it won't matter.

@jack-oquin
Copy link
Member

Should I make a new Kinetic release for this?

@piyushk
Copy link
Member

piyushk commented Jul 2, 2017

That sounds good to me. Yes! Please go ahead and make the release.

@jack-oquin
Copy link
Member

Released with 0.3.1 today.

vmoysiadis pushed a commit to ros-autom/eband_local_planner that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2017
vmoysiadis pushed a commit to ros-autom/eband_local_planner that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2017
vmoysiadis pushed a commit to ros-autom/eband_local_planner that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2017
vmoysiadis pushed a commit to ros-autom/eband_local_planner that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants