Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A permeability model for the excavation damage zone #149

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wenqing
Copy link
Member

@wenqing wenqing commented Jul 16, 2019

See the attached documentation
PermeabilityDamageZone.pdf

)

# Get all files in the sub-directory
FILE(GLOB MAT_SOLID_H RELATIVE ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR} Material/Solid/*.h)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why not move Material dir out of FEM dir?

*
*/

#pragma once
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please replace this

@@ -181,7 +188,8 @@ bool MMPRead(std::string base_file_name)
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
// OK MMPDelete();
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
ScreenMessage("MMPRead ... ");;
ScreenMessage("MMPRead ... ");
;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please delete this empty line

@@ -4909,6 +4941,22 @@ double* CMediumProperties::PermeabilityTensor(long index)
}
break;
}

if (_damage_zone_permeability == NULL)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To make it easier to add new cases, I suggest writing the lines as

if (_damage_zone_permeability != NULL)
{
...
}


namespace SolidProp
{
class MohrCoulombFailureCriterion
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think WX has already implemented MohrCoulomb stuff. Isn't it possible to reuse it?

@wenqing
Copy link
Member Author

wenqing commented Aug 7, 2019

@norihiro-w Thanks. I will revise it later on.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants