Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NAS-131316 / 25.04 / Rename SMART Test Results Fields #10768

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

AlexKarpov98
Copy link
Contributor

Testing:

See ticket comments.
Screenshot 2024-09-30 at 14 12 40

@AlexKarpov98 AlexKarpov98 self-assigned this Sep 30, 2024
@AlexKarpov98 AlexKarpov98 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 30, 2024 11:20
@AlexKarpov98 AlexKarpov98 requested review from RehanY147 and removed request for a team September 30, 2024 11:20
@bugclerk bugclerk changed the title NAS-131316: Rename SMART Test Results Fields NAS-131316 / 25.04 / Rename SMART Test Results Fields Sep 30, 2024
@bugclerk
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.91%. Comparing base (43477fb) to head (2f903eb).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #10768      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.63%   80.91%   +0.28%     
==========================================
  Files        1570     1571       +1     
  Lines       51514    52116     +602     
  Branches     5809     5813       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        41538    42172     +634     
+ Misses       9976     9944      -32     
Flag Coverage Δ
?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@RehanY147 RehanY147 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

Copy link
Contributor

@RehanY147 RehanY147 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes seem different than what's recommended. William asked the remaining to be 0% if it's completed. The PR changes it to "Completed". Also, the PR is missing the fix on the Error field mentioned in the ticket description.

@AlexKarpov98
Copy link
Contributor Author

AlexKarpov98 commented Oct 2, 2024

@RehanY147 - I talked with @william-gr

Screenshot 2024-10-02 at 13 59 48
  1. So we should keep current implementation.

  2. Regarding error field - it's updated now.

please review it once again 😄

@AlexKarpov98 AlexKarpov98 requested a review from RehanY147 October 2, 2024 11:00
@RehanY147
Copy link
Contributor

@AlexKarpov98 Please review this ticket. It is addressed to the same area in the UI. In fact, the same column field. See if it should be handled here as I suspect your code in this PR will need to be changed again.
https://ixsystems.atlassian.net/browse/NAS-131537

Copy link
Contributor

@RehanY147 RehanY147 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See above comment

@AlexKarpov98
Copy link
Contributor Author

AlexKarpov98 commented Oct 3, 2024

Hey @RehanY147
I think we should merge this one and do fixes for this ticket https://ixsystems.atlassian.net/browse/NAS-131537 separately

BTW - once you commented PR, no need to request changes as well, comment is counted as a review as well 😄

@AlexKarpov98 AlexKarpov98 requested a review from RehanY147 October 3, 2024 07:53
@AlexKarpov98 AlexKarpov98 merged commit fe686fc into master Oct 3, 2024
9 checks passed
@AlexKarpov98 AlexKarpov98 deleted the NAS-131316 branch October 3, 2024 21:53
@bugclerk
Copy link
Contributor

bugclerk commented Oct 3, 2024

This PR has been merged and conversations have been locked.
If you would like to discuss more about this issue please use our forums or raise a Jira ticket.

@truenas truenas locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants