-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow Double Down v1.1.0 Installation in Dockerfile #944
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
14d8914
update to 5.5.1
ahnaf-tahmid-chowdhury b7a6931
remove off
ahnaf-tahmid-chowdhury 241b8d4
dd_VERSION
ahnaf-tahmid-chowdhury 0c6d98a
Allow Double Down v1.1.0 Installation in Dockerfile (#929 #944)
ahnaf-tahmid-chowdhury 5f533ad
add off
ahnaf-tahmid-chowdhury a27ba73
remove libhdf5-dev
ahnaf-tahmid-chowdhury bd0b51f
Merge branch 'develop' into dd-ci-fix
ahnaf-tahmid-chowdhury File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure it's worth have an extra image without GEANT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While updating action.yml, I have noticed we are not using Geant4 by default. Do you like to change the default?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The treatment of GEANT and Double Down are a little different from each other.
Testing with or without GEANT only demonstrates whether DAGMC will integrate successfully with GEANT as a transport code.
Testing with or without Double Down modifies the underlying fundamental behavior of DAGMC with all transport codes.
A few conclusions of this:
A) It makes sense to have fewer images, i.e. none that are build without GEANT and without DD because we can test our build without them even if they are installed.
B) It makes sense to do the advisory testing with the minimal number of options turned on, ie. without GEANT even if it is installed in the image.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've made changes to streamline the build process and reduce the number of arguments as much as possible. But it seems, I've ended up creating extra Docker images. 🙂
I think we have two options:
action.yml
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let me know, which step to proceed. Or, any other suggestions?