Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upd: DNSCrypt url fixed. #1111

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/guides/misc/tor/dnssec.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -13,4 +13,4 @@ To re-run the above test, you also need to:

#### Alternatives

* An alternative would be using [DNSCrypt](https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole/wiki/DNSCrypt), but this leaves you in a position where you have to trust the [DNSCrypt resolver](https://www.dnscrypt.org/dnscrypt-resolvers.html) since your IP is not anonymized - [unless you configure DNSCrypt to route over Tor](https://github.com/DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-proxy/issues/399#issuecomment-214329222).
* An alternative would be using [DNSCrypt (Archive)](https://web.archive.org/web/20210907204828/https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole/wiki/DNSCrypt) or [DNSCrypt-2.0 (Archive)](https://web.archive.org/web/20220617185156/https://github.com/pi-hole/pi-hole/wiki/DNSCrypt-2.0), but this leaves you in a position where you have to trust the [DNSCrypt resolver](https://www.dnscrypt.org/dnscrypt-resolvers.html) since your IP is not anonymized - [unless you configure DNSCrypt to route over Tor](https://github.com/DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-proxy/issues/399#issuecomment-214329222).
Comment on lines 14 to +16
Copy link
Member

@rdwebdesign rdwebdesign Oct 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The original wiki pages were removed because they were really outdated (last update was 2016 or 2018).
Pointing these links to web archive (outdated content) is a bad idea.

I see 3 solutions:

  1. replace the old links with more current references to DNSCrypt (if there are good references);
  2. completely rewrite Alternatives section (maybe using different solutions) and include up-to-date references;
  3. completely remove the Alternatives section.

Personally I think the last option would be better.