✅ Deploy Preview for rococo-souffle-a625f5 ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	cbb125a
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/rococo-souffle-a625f5/deploys/67191747df03c20008c13a5e
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-565--rococo-souffle-a625f5.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Sorry @Sharqiewicz this ticket was not ready for dev and should not have been in the Ready column. There is still ongoing discussion.

@prayagd The definition of Pool liabilities as "Amount of liquidity provided initially by LPs" is wrong (see also my comment here).

Pool liabilities deviate from the "Amount of liquidity provided initially by LPs" further and further due to

• slippage
• accumulated fees

Eventually the liability will deviate a lot from the "Amount of liquidity provided initially by LPs".

There is no simple, intuitive way to explain what "liability" means. As I wrote before, it is a number used for internal accounting to determine the current slippage.

@prayagd not sure if you saw my comment here, but shall we keep the column names consistent in adding the word Pool, or not? Let's remove it from both (like Nabla have) as the user is already in the Swap Pools page?

@prayagd not sure if you saw my comment #474 (comment), but shall we keep the column names consistent in adding the word Pool, or not? Let's remove it from both (like Nabla have) as the user is already in the Swap Pools page?

Agree to the suggestion

@vadaynujra @prayagd What is the conclusion?

@TorstenStueber Now that we know caps are not relevant for us for this version of Forex AMM, should we discard all the changes above to add tool tips and add one more column to show the CR? was the agreement in the meeting to remove the liabilities too?

@Sharqiewicz I would suggest getting rid of the tool tips and just renaming the first column to "Asset", Suggesting this because the ticket has been going on for a longer time and all further changes can be done in a separate ticket. do you agree @TorstenStueber @ebma ?

Sure, we can reduce the scope here and follow up in another ticket.

Yes, agree. Let's get this ticket done with a reduced scope and let's open another ticket if we consider this necessary. I am currently writing the Forex AMM docs in a way that it should work well with the current table layout.

@Sharqiewicz let's reduce the scope and just rename the first column to "Asset"

@prayagd Is it good now?