-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
[WIP] OCPBUGS-45729: Updating ose-openshift-apiserver-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.19 #486
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
wangke19
wants to merge
6
commits into
openshift:main
Choose a base branch
from
wangke19:go-version-update
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
caca625
Update go 1.23 and ocp 4.19
wangke19 8ddda1a
Fix image quay.io/coreos/etcd:latest not found
wangke19 7f86f05
Update k8s.io 0.32.1
wangke19 4d86479
Fix build errors
wangke19 7349eb7
Update k8s.io/apiserver reference of openshift/kubernetes-apiserver#65
wangke19 231a2b8
Fix failed unit tests
wangke19 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
The table of contents is too big for display.
Diff view
Diff view
The diff you're trying to view is too large. We only load the first 3000 changed files.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | ||
build_root_image: | ||
name: release | ||
namespace: openshift | ||
tag: rhel-9-release-golang-1.22-openshift-4.18 | ||
tag: rhel-9-release-golang-1.23-openshift-4.19 |
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like to ask why you added this block of code to validate resource limits? The func
ValidateResourceQuota
actually validate ObjectMeta as well which leads to all of failures on unit tests due to the fact this RQ object doesn't have name or namespace values which are required.Also please separate the vendor code change to one commit and your own changes to another commit. This commit is so big. It is very hard to review as browser can't load such a big diff.