Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove 'Examples' from title of Appendix A #163

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 8, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1494,9 +1494,9 @@ issuers in Self-Sovereign Identity ecosystems using TRAIN</title>
</front>
</reference>

# Examples with Credentials in Various Formats {#alternative_credential_formats}
# Usage with Various Credential Formats {#alternative_credential_formats}

OpenID for Verifiable Presentations is Credential format agnostic, i.e., it is designed to allow applications to request and receive Verifiable Presentations and Verifiable Credentials in any format, not limited to the formats defined in [@!VC_DATA]. This section aims to illustrate this with examples utilizing different Credential formats. Customization of OpenID for Verifiable Presentation for Credential formats other than those defined in [@!VC_DATA] uses extension points of Presentation Exchange [@!DIF.PresentationExchange].
OpenID for Verifiable Presentations is Credential format agnostic, i.e., it is designed to allow applications to request and receive Verifiable Presentations and Verifiable Credentials in any Credential format. This section defines Credential Format Profiles for some of the known Credential formats. Other specifications or deployments can define their own Credential Format Profiles.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, we should describe how they would define the profiles. In OID4VP less of a problem but in OID4VCI there is an issue because of potential name clashes of extra parameters depending on format.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I think that's a good idea - thanks for creating the issue!


## W3C Verifiable Credentials

Expand Down
Loading