Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove 'Examples' from title of Appendix A #163

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 8, 2024

Conversation

jogu
Copy link
Collaborator

@jogu jogu commented Apr 26, 2024

It contains some normative requirements so shouldn't be tagged as only examples.

closes #142

It contains some normative requirements so shouldn't be tagged as
only examples.

closes #142
Copy link
Collaborator

@Sakurann Sakurann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a little more than changing a title is needed to clarify this section is normative, I think

openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

OpenID for Verifiable Presentations is Credential format agnostic, i.e., it is designed to allow applications to request and receive Verifiable Presentations and Verifiable Credentials in any format, not limited to the formats defined in [@!VC_DATA]. This section aims to illustrate this with examples utilizing different Credential formats. Customization of OpenID for Verifiable Presentation for Credential formats other than those defined in [@!VC_DATA] uses extension points of Presentation Exchange [@!DIF.PresentationExchange].
OpenID for Verifiable Presentations is Credential format agnostic, i.e., it is designed to allow applications to request and receive Verifiable Presentations and Verifiable Credentials in any Credential format. This section defines Credential Format Profiles for some of the known Credential formats. Other specifications or deployments can define their own Credential Format Profiles.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMO, we should describe how they would define the profiles. In OID4VP less of a problem but in OID4VCI there is an issue because of potential name clashes of extra parameters depending on format.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I think that's a good idea - thanks for creating the issue!

Copy link
Contributor

@awoie awoie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I created a separate issue for how to define a profile section: #170

@jogu jogu merged commit ad8823d into main May 8, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Appendix 'A' is labelled "Examples" but contains normative text
5 participants