-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove 'Examples' from title of Appendix A #163
Conversation
It contains some normative requirements so shouldn't be tagged as only examples. closes #142
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a little more than changing a title is needed to clarify this section is normative, I think
Co-authored-by: Kristina <[email protected]>
|
||
OpenID for Verifiable Presentations is Credential format agnostic, i.e., it is designed to allow applications to request and receive Verifiable Presentations and Verifiable Credentials in any format, not limited to the formats defined in [@!VC_DATA]. This section aims to illustrate this with examples utilizing different Credential formats. Customization of OpenID for Verifiable Presentation for Credential formats other than those defined in [@!VC_DATA] uses extension points of Presentation Exchange [@!DIF.PresentationExchange]. | ||
OpenID for Verifiable Presentations is Credential format agnostic, i.e., it is designed to allow applications to request and receive Verifiable Presentations and Verifiable Credentials in any Credential format. This section defines Credential Format Profiles for some of the known Credential formats. Other specifications or deployments can define their own Credential Format Profiles. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO, we should describe how they would define the profiles. In OID4VP less of a problem but in OID4VCI there is an issue because of potential name clashes of extra parameters depending on format
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I think that's a good idea - thanks for creating the issue!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I created a separate issue for how to define a profile section: #170
It contains some normative requirements so shouldn't be tagged as only examples.
closes #142