Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: updated to python 3.12 #127

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

BilalQamar95
Copy link

Description

For details, see tracking issue #120

@BilalQamar95 BilalQamar95 self-assigned this Oct 23, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.78%. Comparing base (590e77d) to head (6567c3b).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #127   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.78%   97.78%           
=======================================
  Files           4        4           
  Lines         226      226           
  Branches       13        8    -5     
=======================================
  Hits          221      221           
  Misses          5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ def test_missing_block_id(self, url):
('org', 'course', 'run', '1', 'category', 'name:more_name', None),
)
@ddt.unpack
# pylint: disable=too-many-positional-arguments
def test_valid_locations(self, org, course, run, ccx, category, name, revision):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
def test_valid_locations(self, org, course, run, ccx, category, name, revision):
def test_valid_locations(self, org, course, run, ccx, category, name, revision): # pylint: disable=too-many-positional-arguments

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Placing the pylint disable above the function would be better here imo because the function has a long signature with seven arguments. Adding an inline comment would crowd the line, making it harder to read. An above-line comment maintains clarity and improves readability for reviewers and maintainers.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed it in the upgrade requirements PR. You can simply rebase the PR to get it resolved
5c7cef1#diff-4a1e5a86c548b14ce47668a70a21cf73c0d23eb4fb780ad87e2bc3f1e596ed9fR308

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants