Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding disk buffering, part 3 #194
Adding disk buffering, part 3 #194
Changes from 12 commits
213d35a
452ed06
857c569
5ca88c7
31bc4bf
3b3cc1f
9d1f570
d1eb99c
8474016
663eb9c
31d1cc0
79842cc
804d8bd
7c3fe19
c407bab
2abf0af
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we make the
DefaultExportScheduler
an instance field passed thru constructor? Both good DI practice and saves object creation.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right, that sounds way better! I'll add the changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, it's updated now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not for this PR:
If using the Kotlin
explicitApi
mode, all those interfaces have to be madepublic
, then you can use theorg.jetbrains.kotlinx.binary-compatibility-validator
plugin to generate a public API file its quite nice.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That sounds really nice 👍 I think we should create an issue to address it later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@marandaneto do you mind creating an issue for this? I'm not familiar with it and would love to see an example in action. Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, #217
It's quite simple, the plugin does all the magic, all you need to do is install the plugin and make the commands part of the CI pipeline, so the CI generates the API dump in every CI run if any, the check is already done automatically part of the builtin gradle
check
.