Follow Up: Upgrade Eslint version to v9
#10180
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several modifications across different parts of the project. Changes include updating import paths to use absolute references instead of relative paths in multiple Cypress test files, enhancing the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cypress/e2e/login_spec/loginpage.cy.ts (1)
Line range hint
10-12: Break down the test case into smaller, focused scenarios.The current test chains multiple verifications into a single test case. This makes it harder to identify which specific verification failed. Consider breaking it down into separate test cases for better maintainability and clearer failure messages.
- it("should validate login form elements and display validation errors", () => { - loginPage.verifyFormElements().clickSubmit().verifyValidationErrors(); - }); + it("should display all required form elements", () => { + loginPage.verifyFormElements(); + }); + + it("should display validation errors when submitting empty form", () => { + loginPage.clickSubmit(); + loginPage.verifyValidationErrors(); + });tsconfig.json (1)
27-27: Add spaces after commas for better readability.The change to include additional TypeScript files is good, but the formatting could be improved.
- "include": ["src/**/*.ts", "src/**/*.tsx", "src/**/*.d.ts", "care.config.ts","scripts/**/*.ts","cypress.config.ts","plugins/**/*.ts"], + "include": ["src/**/*.ts", "src/**/*.tsx", "src/**/*.d.ts", "care.config.ts", "scripts/**/*.ts", "cypress.config.ts", "plugins/**/*.ts"],
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
cypress/e2e/login_spec/loginpage.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/support/commands.ts(1 hunks)eslint.config.mjs(1 hunks)plugins/treeShakeCareIcons.ts(1 hunks)scripts/sort-locales.js(0 hunks)tailwind.config.js(0 hunks)tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- scripts/sort-locales.js
- tailwind.config.js
🔇 Additional comments (4)
plugins/treeShakeCareIcons.ts (1)
64-64: LGTM! Type annotation improves type safety.The addition of the type annotation
{ [key: string]: string }makes the object's structure explicit and helps catch potential type-related issues early.eslint.config.mjs (1)
37-37: LGTM! Parser configuration aligns with ESLint v9 requirements.The addition of the TypeScript parser configuration is correct and necessary for the ESLint upgrade.
cypress/support/commands.ts (1)
Line range hint
64-69: LGTM! DOM attachment check improves test reliability.The addition of the DOM attachment check helps prevent flaky tests by ensuring elements are properly attached before interaction.
tsconfig.json (1)
27-27: Verify the existence of newly included directories.Let's ensure that all the newly included directories exist and contain TypeScript files.
✅ Verification successful
All specified directories and files exist and are valid ✓
scripts/directory contains 3 TypeScript filescypress.config.tsexists at root levelplugins/directory contains 1 TypeScript file🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the newly included directories exist and contain TypeScript files echo "Checking for TypeScript files in newly included paths..." # Check scripts directory echo "Checking scripts directory:" fd -e ts . scripts/ # Check cypress config echo -e "\nChecking cypress config:" [ -f cypress.config.ts ] && echo "✓ cypress.config.ts exists" || echo "✗ cypress.config.ts not found" # Check plugins directory echo -e "\nChecking plugins directory:" fd -e ts . plugins/Length of output: 581
…com/AdityaJ2305/care_fe into eslint_version_upgrade_v9_follow_up
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cypress/tsconfig.json (1)
17-19: Consider scoping the path alias more precisely.While the path alias configuration works, consider restricting it to specific subdirectories to prevent unintended access to files outside the test scope:
"paths": { - "@/*": ["./*"], + "@/*": ["./support/*", "./pageObject/*", "./e2e/*"] }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/facility_creation.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/login_spec/loginpage.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/patient_creation.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/patient_encounter.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/users_spec/user_creation.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/support/e2e.ts(1 hunks)cypress/support/index.ts(1 hunks)cypress/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- cypress/support/e2e.ts
- cypress/support/index.ts
- cypress/e2e/patient_spec/patient_encounter.cy.ts
- cypress/e2e/patient_spec/patient_creation.cy.ts
- cypress/e2e/users_spec/user_creation.cy.ts
- cypress/e2e/facility_spec/facility_creation.cy.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- cypress/e2e/login_spec/loginpage.cy.ts
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cypress/tsconfig.json (1)
17-19: Verify path alias usage across test files.The configuration looks good for enabling absolute imports. Let's verify that all test files are consistently using the new
@/*alias pattern.✅ Verification successful
Path aliases are consistently used across all test files ✅
All TypeScript files in the Cypress directory are properly using the
@/*path alias for imports. No relative paths were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining relative imports in Cypress test files # that should be using the new @/* alias # Look for relative imports (../) in Cypress test files echo "Checking for relative imports that could use @/* alias:" rg -t ts "from ['\"]\.\./" cypress/ # Look for current directory imports (./) in Cypress test files echo -e "\nChecking for current directory imports that could use @/* alias:" rg -t ts "from ['\"]\./" cypress/Length of output: 343
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, check if TypeScript files exist echo "TypeScript files in cypress directory:" fd -e ts . cypress/ echo -e "\nChecking for any kind of imports in TypeScript files:" rg -t ts "^import .* from" cypress/ echo -e "\nChecking for @/* alias usage:" rg -t ts "from ['\"]\@\/" cypress/Length of output: 2628
|
@AdityaJ2305 Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌 |
Proposed Changes
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Tests
Chores
Refactor