Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix tox env ordering issue #1457

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2020
Merged

Fix tox env ordering issue #1457

merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2020

Conversation

sbethur
Copy link
Contributor

@sbethur sbethur commented May 19, 2020

- [ ] I've updated CHANGELOG.md if applicable.

- [ ] I've added tests applicable for this pull request

What does this Pull Request accomplish?

Fix tox env ordering issue:

  • flake8 and docs depend on codegen
  • test depends on installers (for install_local_wheel.py --driver nitclk), not codegen
  • pkg depends on installers

List issues fixed by this Pull Request below, if any.

None

What testing has been done?

Ran tox in serial and parallel modes and verified the ordering is correct.

- flake8 and docs depend on codegen
- test depends on installers (for `install_local_wheel.py --driver nitclk`), not codegen
- pkg depends on installers
@sbethur sbethur requested a review from marcoskirsch May 19, 2020 18:15
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 19, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1457 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1457   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.93%   91.93%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        3658     3658           
=======================================
  Hits         3363     3363           
  Misses        295      295           
Flag Coverage Δ
#codegenunittests 88.24% <ø> (ø)
#nifakeunittests 96.40% <ø> (ø)
#nimodinstunittests 95.37% <ø> (ø)
#nitclkunittests 95.45% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5740196...2c8d6be. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@marcoskirsch marcoskirsch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this allows us to run tox in parallel on CI, why wouldn't we want to do it?

@marcoskirsch marcoskirsch merged commit 8564ea1 into master May 20, 2020
@marcoskirsch marcoskirsch deleted the fix_tox_odering_issue branch May 20, 2020 02:36
@sbethur
Copy link
Contributor Author

sbethur commented May 29, 2020

If this allows us to run tox in parallel on CI, why wouldn't we want to do it?

I don't see a reason why not. Trying it out in #1471.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants