Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #811]🎨Refactor Client error handle🔥 #812

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2024
Merged

[ISSUE #811]🎨Refactor Client error handle🔥 #812

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jul 19, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #811

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved client handling capabilities in the Name Server for better communication and performance.
    • Enhanced flexibility in the RouteInfoManager with the new client instantiation method.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Refined error handling across client methods to provide clearer and more specific error messages.
  • Refactor

    • Restructured initialization logic for the DefaultRequestProcessor and RouteInfoManager.
  • Chores

    • Removed deprecated remote client structures to simplify the architecture.
    • Updated return types across multiple client methods for consistency in error reporting.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the RocketMQ server's architecture, particularly in client handling and error management. The modifications introduce a more robust remote client configuration and refactor error handling to utilize a custom result type, improving clarity and responsiveness. By removing outdated components and streamlining dependency management, these updates aim to elevate overall system performance and maintainability.

Changes

Files Change Summary
rocketmq-namesrv/src/bootstrap.rs Added RocketmqDefaultClient and TokioClientConfig to NameServerRuntime, enhancing remote communication capabilities; updated Builder to integrate new clients.
rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs Removed NamesrvConfig, refactored constructor to introduce new_with for better dependency management, simplifying instantiation.
rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs Replaced remote_client with remoting_client of type Arc<RocketmqDefaultClient, updated constructor and notification handling for asynchronous execution.
rocketmq-remoting/src/clients.rs Completely removed RemoteClient and its methods, indicating a shift in client architecture towards simplicity and efficiency in remote interactions.
rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/blocking_client.rs Changed send method's return type to crate::Result<()>, refining error handling to use custom crate-defined errors for consistency.
rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/client.rs Updated methods to replace anyhow::Result with a custom Result, improving error handling by checking for connection issues and providing clearer messages.
rocketmq-remoting/src/error.rs Introduced new Error variants, ConnectionInvalid and Elapsed, enhancing the granularity of error reporting for asynchronous operations.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Refactor Client error handle (#811)
Improve error clarity and handling (#811)
Simplify client structure and dependencies Some components remain, indicating not all simplifications were addressed.

Poem

In the server's heart, new clients bloom,
With clearer paths, they banish the gloom.
Errors now speak, with voices so bright,
As rabbits hop through code, in pure delight! 🐇✨
Together we thrive, in a dance so grand,
RocketMQ's future, a wondrous land!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mxsm
Copy link
Owner Author

mxsm commented Jul 19, 2024

🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 54 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.05%. Comparing base (6c65f51) to head (913c389).

Files Patch % Lines
rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/client.rs 0.00% 23 Missing ⚠️
rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs 0.00% 14 Missing ⚠️
rocketmq-namesrv/src/bootstrap.rs 0.00% 9 Missing ⚠️
rocketmq-remoting/src/error.rs 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
...namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/blocking_client.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #812      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   28.02%   28.05%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         297      296       -1     
  Lines       23784    23764      -20     
==========================================
  Hits         6666     6666              
+ Misses      17118    17098      -20     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/client.rs (1)

48-54: Update Required: Ensure Consistency in Return Type

The connect function in rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/blocking_client.rs still uses anyhow::Result. To maintain consistency with the updated return type Result<Client> in rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/client.rs, update the return type in rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/blocking_client.rs.

  • File: rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/blocking_client.rs
  • Function: connect

Update the return type to match Result<Client> and ensure error handling aligns with the new type.

Analysis chain

LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved. The return type change to Result<Client> and the updated error handling logic improve robustness.

However, ensure that all function calls to connect match the new return type.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `connect` match the new return type.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'connect('

Length of output: 99


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `connect` match the new return type.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'connect\\('

Length of output: 2092


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract context around the usage of the `connect` function to verify return type and error handling.

# Extract context around the usage in `rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/blocking_client.rs`
rg --type rust -A 10 -B 5 $'connect\\(' rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/blocking_client.rs

# Extract context around the usage in `rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/client.rs`
rg --type rust -A 10 -B 5 $'connect\\(' rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/client.rs

# Extract context around the usage in `rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/rocketmq_default_impl.rs`
rg --type rust -A 10 -B 5 $'connect\\(' rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/rocketmq_default_impl.rs

Length of output: 2297

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6c65f51 and 913c389.

Files selected for processing (7)
  • rocketmq-namesrv/src/bootstrap.rs (4 hunks)
  • rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs (3 hunks)
  • rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs (6 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/clients.rs (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/blocking_client.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/client.rs (5 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/error.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/clients.rs
Additional comments not posted (14)
rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/blocking_client.rs (1)

64-70: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved. The return type change to crate::Result<()> and the simplified error handling logic improve clarity and maintainability.

However, ensure that all function calls to send match the new return type.

Verification successful

Let's correct the regex pattern and re-run the search to verify the function usage in the codebase.


Let's extract the relevant lines around the send function usages to verify the return type and error handling.


Verified: The function usage matches the new return type.

The return type change to crate::Result<()> has been correctly propagated, and the error handling logic aligns with the new implementation. No issues were found in the usage of the send function.

  • rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/blocking_client.rs
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/client.rs
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `send` match the new return type.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'send('

Length of output: 90


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `send` match the new return type.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type.
rg --type rust -A 5 'send\('

Length of output: 7682


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract relevant lines around the `send` function usages to verify the return type and error handling.

# Extract lines around `send` function usage in `rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/blocking_client.rs`
rg --type rust -A 5 -B 5 'send\(' rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/blocking_client.rs

# Extract lines around `send` function usage in `rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/client.rs`
rg --type rust -A 5 -B 5 'send\(' rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/client.rs

Length of output: 1466

rocketmq-remoting/src/error.rs (1)

53-58: New error variants enhance error reporting.

The addition of ConnectionInvalid and Elapsed error variants improves the granularity and specificity of error handling.

rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/client.rs (3)

68-70: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved. The return type change to Result<RemotingCommand> improves consistency.

However, ensure that all function calls to send_read match the new return type.

Verification successful

Let's correct the regex pattern and re-run the script to verify the function usage of send_read.


Let's inspect the context around the usage of send_read in rocketmq_default_impl.rs to ensure the return type is handled correctly.


Function usage verified successfully.

The return type Result<RemotingCommand> is properly managed in the codebase, ensuring consistency and correct error handling.

  • rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/rocketmq_default_impl.rs: The function call to send_read correctly handles the Result type.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `send_read` match the new return type.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'send_read('

Length of output: 105


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `send_read` match the new return type.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type.
rg --type rust -A 5 'send_read\('

Length of output: 993


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Inspect the context around the usage of `send_read` in `rocketmq_default_impl.rs` to ensure the return type is handled correctly.

# Test: Search for the function usage and display surrounding lines for context.
rg --type rust -A 10 -B 10 'send_read\(' rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/rocketmq_default_impl.rs

Length of output: 1027


117-131: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved. The return type change to Result<RemotingCommand> and the updated error handling logic improve clarity.

However, ensure that all function calls to read match the new return type.

Verification successful

LGTM! The function usage matches the new return type.

The code changes are approved. The return type change to Result<RemotingCommand> and the updated error handling logic improve clarity. The function calls to read correctly match the new return type.

  • rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/client.rs
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/rocketmq_default_impl.rs
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `read` match the new return type.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'read('

Length of output: 90


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `read` match the new return type.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type.
rg --type rust -A 5 'read\('

Length of output: 46116


98-107: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The code changes are approved. The return type change to Result<()> and the updated error handling logic improve clarity.

However, ensure that all function calls to send match the new return type.

Verification successful

Function usage verified!

The function calls to send match the new return type Result<()> across the codebase.

  • rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/client.rs
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/blocking_client.rs
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/rocketmq_default_impl.rs
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `send` match the new return type.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'send('

Length of output: 90


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `send` match the new return type.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type.
rg --type rust -A 5 'send('

Length of output: 90


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `send` match the new return type.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type.
rg --type rust -A 5 'send\('

Length of output: 7682


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `send` match the new return type.

# Extracting surrounding lines to verify return type usage
rg --type rust -A 5 -B 5 'send\(' rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/client.rs rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/blocking_client.rs rocketmq-remoting/src/clients/rocketmq_default_impl.rs

Length of output: 4054

rocketmq-namesrv/src/bootstrap.rs (4)

47-52: Ensure proper initialization of new fields.

The new fields tokio_client_config and remoting_client are correctly added to the NameServerRuntime struct. Ensure these fields are properly initialized and used throughout the struct.


143-145: Ensure proper initialization of tokio_client_config and remoting_client.

The tokio_client_config and remoting_client are correctly initialized and passed to NameServerRuntime. Ensure these fields are properly used in the NameServerRuntime.


149-154: Ensure consistency in the initialization of RouteInfoManager.

The RouteInfoManager is now initialized with remoting_client. Ensure this change is consistent with the rest of the codebase.

Verification successful

Initialization of RouteInfoManager is consistent.

The RouteInfoManager is consistently initialized with remoting_client across the codebase.

  • rocketmq-namesrv/src/bootstrap.rs
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the initialization of `RouteInfoManager` with `remoting_client`.

# Test: Search for the `RouteInfoManager` initialization. Expect: Only occurances of the new initialization method.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'RouteInfoManager::new'

Length of output: 594


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Perform a comprehensive search for `RouteInfoManager::new` across the entire codebase to ensure consistency.

# Test: Search for all instances of `RouteInfoManager::new` initialization.
rg --type rust -A 5 'RouteInfoManager::new'

Length of output: 594


85-85: Ensure correct initialization of DefaultRequestProcessor.

The DefaultRequestProcessor is now initialized without NamesrvConfig. Ensure this change is consistent with the rest of the codebase.

Verification successful

Initialization of DefaultRequestProcessor without NamesrvConfig is consistent.

The DefaultRequestProcessor is correctly initialized without NamesrvConfig in rocketmq-namesrv/src/bootstrap.rs, and this change is consistent with the rest of the codebase.

  • rocketmq-namesrv/src/bootstrap.rs: DefaultRequestProcessor::new is used without NamesrvConfig.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the initialization of `DefaultRequestProcessor` without `NamesrvConfig`.

# Test: Search for the `DefaultRequestProcessor` initialization. Expect: Only occurances of the new initialization method.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'DefaultRequestProcessor::new_with'

Length of output: 55


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the initialization of `DefaultRequestProcessor` without `NamesrvConfig`.

# Test: Search for all initializations of `DefaultRequestProcessor`. Expect: Only occurrences of the new initialization method.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'DefaultRequestProcessor::new'

Length of output: 494


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the initialization of `DefaultRequestProcessor` without `NamesrvConfig`.

# Test: Search for all instances of `DefaultRequestProcessor` and `NamesrvConfig`. Expect: No occurrences of `NamesrvConfig` in `DefaultRequestProcessor` initializations.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'DefaultRequestProcessor'
rg --type rust $'NamesrvConfig'

Length of output: 8127

rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs (2)

214-217: Ensure proper initialization with new_with method.

The new new_with method initializes DefaultRequestProcessor without NamesrvConfig. Ensure this change is consistent with the rest of the codebase.


63-63: Ensure correct derive attributes.

The Debug trait has been removed from the derive attributes. Ensure this change does not affect logging or debugging capabilities.

Verification successful

The removal of the Debug trait from DefaultRequestProcessor does not affect logging or debugging capabilities.

The searches did not reveal any direct or indirect usage of the Debug trait for DefaultRequestProcessor.

  • No instances of DefaultRequestProcessor being used in logging or debugging macros/traits were found.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of removing the `Debug` trait from `DefaultRequestProcessor`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `DefaultRequestProcessor` in logging or debugging. Expect: No errors or warnings related to missing `Debug` trait.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'DefaultRequestProcessor'

Length of output: 5100


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify indirect usage of the `Debug` trait for `DefaultRequestProcessor`.

# Test: Search for logging or debugging macros/traits that might involve `DefaultRequestProcessor`.
rg --type rust -A 5 'log::' | rg 'DefaultRequestProcessor' || rg --type rust -A 5 'debug!' | rg 'DefaultRequestProcessor'

Length of output: 116

rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs (3)

76-76: Ensure proper integration of remoting_client.

The new field remoting_client is correctly added to the RouteInfoManager struct. Ensure this field is properly initialized and used throughout the struct.


Line range hint 81-93:
Ensure proper initialization of RouteInfoManager.

The RouteInfoManager is now initialized with remoting_client. Ensure this change is consistent with the rest of the codebase.


600-614: Ensure correct implementation of asynchronous call.

The asynchronous call using remoting_client is correctly implemented. Ensure the timeout parameter is appropriate and consistent with the rest of the codebase.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Refactor Client error handle
2 participants