Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1006]🎨Fix code style #1007

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

[ISSUE #1006]🎨Fix code style #1007

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Sep 27, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1006

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved error handling for the MQClientAPI, ensuring a default value is returned when remarks are not available, enhancing error reporting robustness.
  • Chores
    • Added attributes to suppress unnecessary return warnings in the main functions of the broker and nameserver bootstrap servers.
  • Documentation
    • Removed lengthy licensing comments in the command line interface for a more concise licensing statement.

@mxsm
Copy link
Owner Author

mxsm commented Sep 27, 2024

🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on enhancing error handling across multiple components of the RocketMQ project. Key modifications include improved error formatting in the MQClientAPIImpl to ensure a default value is returned for missing remarks. Additionally, new attributes have been added to the main functions in the broker and nameserver bootstrap files to suppress unnecessary return warnings. Documentation updates were made by removing an extensive licensing comment in the CLI component.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs Modified error handling to include cloned().unwrap_or_default() for remarks.
rocketmq-broker/src/bin/broker_bootstrap_server.rs Added #[allow(clippy::needless_return)] attribute to main function.
rocketmq-namesrv/src/bin/namesrv_bootstrap_server.rs Added #[allow(clippy::needless_return)] attribute to main function.
rocketmq-cli/src/command_line.rs Removed a lengthy licensing comment, leaving a shorter version.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Fix code style (#1006) The PR does not address any code style issues.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the code where errors dwell,
A change was made to serve us well.
With defaults set, no strings will stray,
Robust and clear, come what may.
Hooray for fixes, let’s all cheer,
For error handling, we hold dear! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 27, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 19.93%. Comparing base (e0e896f) to head (f41e8fd).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...mq-client/src/implementation/mq_client_api_impl.rs 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1007      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   19.95%   19.93%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         413      413              
  Lines       34440    34440              
==========================================
- Hits         6874     6867       -7     
- Misses      27566    27573       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mxsm
Copy link
Owner Author

mxsm commented Sep 27, 2024

🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥

@mxsm
Copy link
Owner Author

mxsm commented Sep 27, 2024

🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-namesrv/src/bin/namesrv_bootstrap_server.rs (2)

30-30: Approve the lint suppression, but consider a more specific approach.

The addition of #[allow(clippy::needless_return)] is acceptable as it likely addresses a false positive warning due to the #[rocketmq::main] attribute. However, consider the following suggestions:

  1. Use a more specific attribute: #[allow(clippy::needless_return)] applies to the entire function. If the warning is only for the final Ok(()), you could use #[allow(clippy::needless_return)] just for that line instead.

  2. Add a comment explaining why this lint is suppressed. This helps future maintainers understand the reasoning behind this decision.

Example:

#[rocketmq::main]
// Suppress false positive from Clippy due to #[rocketmq::main] attribute
#[allow(clippy::needless_return)]
async fn main() -> anyhow::Result<()> {
    // ... function body ...
    Ok(()) // This return is necessary due to the function signature
}

Line range hint 31-50: Consider improving error handling for the boot() method.

The main function is well-structured and follows good practices. However, there's an opportunity to improve error handling for the boot() method. Currently, if boot() fails, the error is silently ignored. Consider propagating any errors from boot() to ensure robust error handling.

Here's a suggested improvement:

#[rocketmq::main]
#[allow(clippy::needless_return)]
async fn main() -> anyhow::Result<()> {
    // ... existing code ...

    Builder::new()
        .set_name_server_config(namesrv_config)
        .set_server_config(ServerConfig {
            listen_port: args.port,
            bind_address: args.ip,
        })
        .build()
        .boot()
        .await?;  // Add ? to propagate any errors

    Ok(())
}

This change ensures that any errors occurring during the boot process are properly handled and reported.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f41e8fd and 2f71714.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/bin/broker_bootstrap_server.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-cli/src/command_line.rs (0 hunks)
  • rocketmq-namesrv/src/bin/namesrv_bootstrap_server.rs (1 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
  • rocketmq-cli/src/command_line.rs
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/bin/broker_bootstrap_server.rs (1)

31-31: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider the implications of suppressing the needless_return lint.

The added attribute #[allow(clippy::needless_return)] suppresses warnings about unnecessary return statements in the main function. While this reduces compiler noise, it's worth considering the following points:

  1. This attribute hides a style recommendation that could potentially improve code conciseness.
  2. The explicit return Ok(()) at the end of main is a common Rust idiom and can be considered more readable, justifying the use of this attribute.

To ensure code quality and consistency:

  1. Verify if this approach aligns with the project's coding standards.
  2. Check if similar functions in the project use this attribute or follow a different style.

Alternatively, consider modifying the code to remove the explicit return:

#[rocketmq::main]
async fn main() -> anyhow::Result<()> {
    // ... (existing code) ...
    Builder::new()
        .set_broker_config(broker_config)
        .set_message_store_config(message_store_config)
        .build()
        .boot()
        .await;
    Ok(())
}

This change would eliminate the need for the attribute while maintaining the function's behavior. However, the current approach with the attribute is also valid if it aligns with the project's preferences for explicit returns.

@mxsm mxsm merged commit 190a50f into main Sep 27, 2024
15 checks passed
@mxsm mxsm deleted the optimize-1006 branch September 27, 2024 02:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Fix code style
2 participants