Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1014]📝Update README.md #1015

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2024
Merged

[ISSUE #1014]📝Update README.md #1015

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Sep 28, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1014

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Restructured the README.md for improved clarity and navigation.
    • Added hyperlinks to documentation for key modules: Name Server, Broker, Store, and Client.
    • Simplified the contributions section by retaining only the "Stargazers Over Time" image.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the README.md file involve a restructuring of the documentation for RocketMQ's functional modules. This includes the removal of detailed feature lists and the implementation order for the Rust version of the Name Server, while adding hyperlinks to relevant documentation for various modules. The contributions section has also been simplified, focusing primarily on stargazer information.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Restructured module documentation with added hyperlinks; removed feature lists and implementation order details; simplified contributions section.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Update README.md (#[1014])
Update README.md (#[927]) No specific updates related to this issue were made.
Update README.md (#[918]) No specific updates related to this issue were made.
Update client README.md (#[943]) Changes do not specify if client README updates were included.

Possibly related issues

  • Issue #[927]: This issue also requests an update to the README.md, which aligns with the changes made.
  • Issue #[918]: Similar to issue #[927], it requests documentation updates relevant to the README.md.
  • Issue #[943]: Although this issue specifically mentions the client README.md, the general updates may relate to this as well.

Suggested labels

approved, auto merge

Poem

🐰 In the meadow of code, changes bloom bright,
With links to the modules, oh what a sight!
The features once listed, now take a rest,
Simplified stargazers, we’re doing our best!
Hopping through updates, our docs now align,
A clearer path forward, all thanks to design! 🌼


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5cefbc9 and 022f404.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mxsm
Copy link
Owner Author

mxsm commented Sep 28, 2024

🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 19.92%. Comparing base (5cefbc9) to head (022f404).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1015   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   19.92%   19.92%           
=======================================
  Files         418      418           
  Lines       34502    34502           
=======================================
+ Hits         6875     6876    +1     
+ Misses      27627    27626    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Doc📝] Update README.md
2 participants