[ISSUE #1165]📝Update README.md

[mxsm]

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1165

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Enhanced formatting and consistency in the README.md file.
  • Corrected a typo and improved layout for better readability.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on formatting adjustments and minor corrections in the README.md file. Key modifications include the addition of asterisks for emphasis in specific sections, ensuring consistency across bullet points. The command usage examples for both Windows and Linux remain unchanged. The overall structure and content of the documentation are intact, with no alterations to functionality or logic.

Changes

File	Change Summary
README.md	Formatting adjustments, added asterisks for emphasis, and minor corrections to command usage examples for clarity.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Update README.md	✅

Possibly related issues

• [Doc📝]Update README.md #1016: This issue requests an update to the README.md, which aligns with the changes made in this PR.
• [Doc📝] Update README.md #918: Similar request for updating the README.md, relevant to the current changes.
• [Doc📝] Update README.md #1014: Another request for updating the README.md, which this PR addresses.
• [Doc📝] Update README.md #927: This issue also pertains to updating the README.md, matching the changes made here.

Possibly related PRs

• [ISSUE #1014]📝Update README.md #1015: Updates the README.md, directly related to the changes in this PR.
• [ISSUE #1016]📝Update README.md #1017: Also updates the README.md, making relevant formatting and content adjustments.
• [ISSUE #1163]📝Add rocketmq-rust roadmap #1164: Includes formatting adjustments in the README.md, aligning with the focus of this PR.

Suggested reviewers

• TeslaRustor
• SpaceXCN

Poem

In the README, changes we see,
Formatting bright as can be!
Asterisks dance, commands align,
Clarity shines, oh how divine!
With each little tweak, we cheer,
Documentation's path is clear! 🐇✨

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@mxsm has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d79a092 and bf5ca79.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[mxsm]

🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 16.69%. Comparing base (d79a092) to head (bf5ca79).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1166   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   16.69%   16.69%           
=======================================
  Files         427      427           
  Lines       52695    52695           
=======================================
  Hits         8798     8798           
  Misses      43897    43897           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.