Skip to content

[SER] HitObject::FromRayQuery HLSL -> DXIL lowering #7370

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 24, 2025

Conversation

simoll
Copy link
Contributor

@simoll simoll commented Apr 23, 2025

  • HLSL -> DXIL lowering
  • ast, hlsl->dxil, dxilgen, and ScalarReplAggregatesHLSL tests

SER implementation tracker (#7214)

* HLSL -> DXIL lowering
* ast, hlsl->dxil, dxilgen, and ScalarReplAggregatesHLSL tests

SER implementation tracker (microsoft#7214)
@tex3d tex3d moved this from New to In review in HLSL Roadmap Apr 23, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@tex3d tex3d left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A couple points for follow up:

  • parameter name/type in AST seems misaligned - might be a general static method issue
  • missing scalarrepl-param-hlsl case for overload without attributes.

@simoll
Copy link
Contributor Author

simoll commented Apr 23, 2025

A couple points for follow up:

  • parameter name/type in AST seems misaligned - might be a general static method issue
  • missing scalarrepl-param-hlsl case for overload without attributes.

Copy link
Member

@damyanp damyanp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tex3d tex3d merged commit 624665f into microsoft:main Apr 24, 2025
12 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In review to Done in HLSL Roadmap Apr 24, 2025
@simoll simoll deleted the ser_hlslfromrq_patch branch April 24, 2025 19:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants