Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update node version to 20 #6363

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

aaryan610
Copy link
Collaborator

@aaryan610 aaryan610 commented Jan 9, 2025

Description

This PR updates the node version to 20 for web, space and admin apps.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated base Docker images from Node.js 18 to Node.js 20 for admin, space, and web Dockerfiles
    • Upgraded Node.js runtime environment across multiple project Dockerfiles

@aaryan610 aaryan610 added this to the v0.24.0 milestone Jan 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request involves updating the base Node.js image from version 18 to version 20 across three different Dockerfiles: admin/Dockerfile.admin, space/Dockerfile.space, and web/Dockerfile.web. This change primarily affects the build and installer stages, upgrading the Node.js runtime environment while maintaining the overall structure and functionality of the Dockerfiles.

Changes

File Change Summary
admin/Dockerfile.admin Updated base image from node:18-alpine to node:20-alpine in all build stages
space/Dockerfile.space Updated base image from node:18-alpine to node:20-alpine in builder and installer stages
web/Dockerfile.web Updated base image from node:18-alpine to node:20-alpine in the installer stage

Poem

🐰 Hopping into Node.js twenty,
Dockerfiles dancing, light and plenty
Alpine images, fresh and clean
Upgrading runtime, a coder's dream
Containers leap with newfound might! 🚀

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3ab959c and 80afae9.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • admin/Dockerfile.admin (1 hunks)
  • space/Dockerfile.space (1 hunks)
  • web/Dockerfile.web (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/Dockerfile.web (1)

Line range hint 4-4: Verify package.json compatibility with Node.js 20

While upgrading to Node.js 20, please ensure:

  1. The engines field in package.json is updated to reflect the new Node.js version
  2. All dependencies are compatible with Node.js 20
  3. Breaking changes in Node.js 20 are addressed

Run this script to check package.json files and dependencies:

Also applies to: 18-18

✅ Verification successful

Node.js 20 upgrade is safe to proceed

The codebase analysis shows no compatibility issues with Node.js 20:

  • No explicit Node.js version constraints in any package.json
  • All dependencies, including Next.js 14.x and React 18.x, are compatible with Node.js 20
  • Modern dependency versions are used throughout the project
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json files for Node.js version and dependencies
echo "Checking package.json files..."
fd package.json --type f --exec cat {} \; | jq -r '. | select(.engines != null) | .engines'

# List direct dependencies to verify compatibility
echo "Listing dependencies for compatibility check..."
fd package.json --type f --exec jq -r '.dependencies // {} | keys[]' {} \;

Length of output: 8120


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, check package.json files content
echo "=== Package.json files content ==="
fd package.json --type f --exec sh -c 'echo "\n=== {} ==="; cat {}' \;

Length of output: 18877

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# *****************************************************************************
# STAGE 1: Build the project
# *****************************************************************************
FROM node:18-alpine AS builder
FROM node:20-alpine AS builder
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure consistent Node.js versions across all stages

While the builder stage has been updated to node:20-alpine, the installer and runner stages are still using node:18-alpine. This inconsistency could potentially lead to compatibility issues during the build process.

Apply this diff to maintain version consistency:

# Stage 1
FROM node:20-alpine AS builder

# Stage 2
-FROM node:18-alpine AS installer
+FROM node:20-alpine AS installer

# Stage 3
-FROM node:18-alpine AS runner
+FROM node:20-alpine AS runner

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# *****************************************************************************
# STAGE 1: Build the project
# *****************************************************************************
FROM node:18-alpine AS builder
FROM node:20-alpine AS builder
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure consistent Node.js versions across all stages

Similar to space/Dockerfile.space, there's an inconsistency in Node.js versions across stages. The builder stage uses node:20-alpine while installer and runner stages use node:18-alpine.

Apply this diff to maintain version consistency:

# Stage 1
FROM node:20-alpine AS builder

# Stage 2
-FROM node:18-alpine AS installer
+FROM node:20-alpine AS installer

# Stage 3
-FROM node:18-alpine AS runner
+FROM node:20-alpine AS runner

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ RUN turbo prune --scope=web --docker
# STAGE 2: Install dependencies & build the project
# *****************************************************************************
# Add lockfile and package.json's of isolated subworkspace
FROM node:18-alpine AS installer
FROM node:20-alpine AS installer
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure consistent Node.js versions across all stages and update builder stage

The Node.js version update is inconsistent:

  • Builder stage still uses node:18-alpine (missed update)
  • Installer stage uses node:20-alpine
  • Runner stage uses node:18-alpine

Apply this diff to maintain version consistency and update all stages:

# Stage 1
-FROM node:18-alpine AS builder
+FROM node:20-alpine AS builder

# Stage 2
FROM node:20-alpine AS installer

# Stage 3
-FROM node:18-alpine AS runner
+FROM node:20-alpine AS runner

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@pushya22 pushya22 closed this Jan 9, 2025
@pushya22 pushya22 deleted the chore/update-node-version branch January 9, 2025 10:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants