Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

proposal: change node resource amplification from api to scheduling level #1700

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2023

Conversation

zqzten
Copy link
Member

@zqzten zqzten commented Oct 9, 2023

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

This PR updates the proposal of node resource amplification to reflect the change we have made that we included scheduler level support in this feature. (In previous design, the scheduler level support is only included in the CPU normalization feature.)

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

part of #1539

@koordinator-bot koordinator-bot bot requested review from FillZpp and hormes October 9, 2023 06:03
@zqzten
Copy link
Member Author

zqzten commented Oct 9, 2023

/cc @eahydra

@koordinator-bot koordinator-bot bot requested a review from eahydra October 9, 2023 06:04
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 9, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (d04f86b) 65.93% compared to head (56bcd61) 65.94%.
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1700      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.93%   65.94%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         384      384              
  Lines       41474    41557      +83     
==========================================
+ Hits        27344    27404      +60     
- Misses      12106    12122      +16     
- Partials     2024     2031       +7     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 65.94% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 11 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@eahydra eahydra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@koordinator-bot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: eahydra, hormes

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@koordinator-bot koordinator-bot bot merged commit 14087cb into koordinator-sh:main Oct 10, 2023
19 checks passed
@zqzten zqzten deleted the proposal-update branch October 10, 2023 02:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants