-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 888
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add GitHub tests for karmadactl init --config command #5306
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5306 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 41.64% 41.67% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 653 653
Lines 55484 55518 +34
==========================================
+ Hits 23109 23135 +26
- Misses 30876 30883 +7
- Partials 1499 1500 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
May need help😭😭, in my own project's github action, these tests passed correctly, but when I commit, these tests become failed, what should I do to fix these problems |
/assign |
/ok-to-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks you working for it, could you please add some e2e test here? Maybe take a look at how kubeadm does it.
I have fixed the issues you pointed out and provided new e2e test cases. Please let me know if there are any further modifications needed. :) |
This PR is related to the documentation PR: #5277 |
Add to PR issue body would be great, thank you! |
Ok, I modified the pr and the other two questions about pr and added links to it |
Ask @zhzhuang-zju have a look. |
#5744 is migration to here (for Summer OSPP 2024) |
Based on the OSPP project's requirements, this PR has been reopened. However, the relevant content in this PR has been changed to add automated testing for the new |
/hold cancel |
The code in this PR has been re-pushed and tested, and after a code clean-up, I’ve removed the unnecessary metadata part in KarmadaInitConfig. We can now continue with the previous review.🎉 If need to track this issue, please refer to the relevant changes in this PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thank you!
/lgtm
/cc @zhzhuang-zju if you want to review for karmadactl
@liangyuanpeng: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: want, to, review, for, if, you. Note that only karmada-io members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, just a nit, otherwise LGTM.
.github/workflows/cli.yaml
Outdated
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 | ||
with: | ||
name: karmadactl_config_test_logs_${{ matrix.k8s }} | ||
path: ${{ github.workspace }}/karmadactl-test-logs/${{ matrix.k8s }}/config/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
end of line.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you mean it’s best to add a blank line at the end of the line? If so, the code has already been updated. If I’ve misunderstood, please feel free to correct me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you mean it’s best to add a blank line at the end of the line?
correct
Signed-off-by: tiansuo114 <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/assign @liangyuanpeng
It seems this is the last PR for the summer OSPP program. #5387. |
Yes, this PR is the last one for the OSPP tasks. Up until now, with the merge of this PR into the main branch, all planned PRs have been incorporated into Karmada. |
Yes, it is. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: liangyuanpeng, RainbowMango The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR is an additional test, based on the suggestion provided in url.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #5387
It adds test cases for deploying Karmada services using the
karmadactl init --config
command with a configuration file, similar to the existing tests forkarmadactl init
.Special notes for your reviewer:
@liangyuanpeng
@RainbowMango
This PR currently contains two commits because the test files depend on the new feature for deploying with a configuration file, introduced in #5357. Once that PR is merged, this PR will be rebased, retaining only the commit for adding test cases. However, to save time, it is being submitted for review in advance.Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: