Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: removed basilisk feature #3281

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 10, 2024
Merged

refactor: removed basilisk feature #3281

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 10, 2024

Conversation

inventvenkat
Copy link
Contributor

@inventvenkat inventvenkat commented Jan 8, 2024

Type of Change

  • Bugfix
  • New feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactoring
  • Dependency updates
  • Documentation
  • CI/CD

Description

Removed temp locker related feature. Feature basilisk is used for temp locker and I removed it since it is not used as main source. We are now using Redis for storing temporarily

Additional Changes

  • This PR modifies the API contract
  • This PR modifies the database schema
  • This PR modifies application configuration/environment variables

Motivation and Context

  1. Removed temp locker flow from the application. We already started using redis in place. Temp locker was used as fallback.
  2. Reduction in resource.
  3. reduction in code to make it clean

How did you test it?

Tested generic flows and temp locker usage flows, in sandbox.

Checklist

  • I formatted the code cargo +nightly fmt --all
  • I addressed lints thrown by cargo clippy
  • I reviewed the submitted code
  • I added unit tests for my changes where possible
  • I added a CHANGELOG entry if applicable

@inventvenkat inventvenkat added the S-waiting-on-review Status: This PR has been implemented and needs to be reviewed label Jan 8, 2024
@inventvenkat inventvenkat self-assigned this Jan 8, 2024
@inventvenkat inventvenkat requested review from a team as code owners January 8, 2024 15:34
SanchithHegde
SanchithHegde previously approved these changes Jan 9, 2024
srujanchikke
srujanchikke previously approved these changes Jan 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@srujanchikke srujanchikke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ui tests failures doesn't concern to this PR.

@dracarys18
Copy link
Member

dracarys18 commented Jan 9, 2024

Can you check and remove

locker_key_identifier1 = ""
locker_key_identifier2 = ""
locker_encryption_key1 = ""
locker_encryption_key2 = ""
locker_decryption_key1 = ""
locker_decryption_key2 = ""
vault_encryption_key = ""

these variables from config

@inventvenkat
Copy link
Contributor Author

Removed the basilisk related variables

@Gnanasundari24 Gnanasundari24 added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 10, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 612f8d9 Jan 10, 2024
11 of 13 checks passed
@Gnanasundari24 Gnanasundari24 deleted the removal/temp_locker branch January 10, 2024 10:35
pixincreate added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2024
* 'main' of github.com:juspay/hyperswitch:
  ci: use git commands for pushing commits and tags in nightly release workflows (#3314)
  refactor(connector): [bluesnap] add connector_txn_id fallback for webhook (#3315)
  feat(core): add new payments webhook events (#3212)
  chore: nits and small code improvements found during investigation of PR#3168 (#3259)
  refactor: removed basilisk feature (#3281)
  fix(euclid_wasm): Update braintree config prod (#3288)
  feat(payment_link): add status page for payment link (#3213)
  chore(version): 2024.01.10.0
  chore(postman): update Postman collection files
@pixincreate pixincreate added A-core Area: Core flows and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: This PR has been implemented and needs to be reviewed labels Jan 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-core Area: Core flows
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants