-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Team Information
- Tutor Time: Monday 5:15
- Tutor Name: Ella Zhang
- Tutor Email: [email protected] / [email protected]
Name | Student ID | Student Email | Epic Portfolio Email | Github Username | Team Role |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Haohan Liu | 912541 | haohanl | [email protected] | PandasaurusR | Design/Frontend |
Joshua Carpeggiani | 999380 | jcarpeggiani | [email protected] | joshcarp | Backend |
Angus Farquhar | 1003844 | afarquhar | [email protected] | angusfarquhar | Frontend |
Phillip Tinsley | 992306 | ptinsley | [email protected] | phillipharryt | Scrum master |
Junhao Wang | 860282 | junhaow1 | [email protected] | junhaow1 | Design |
- See https://www.when2meet.com/?9511619-2cwQq for more teams availability
- Version Control: Github
- Workflow Management: Github Projects
- Team Communication: UniMelb Teams "epicportfolio"
- Documentation: Github Wiki
- Backend: Go
- Frontend: React
- Protocol: GPRC
- CI/CD: Github Actions + Google Cloud Build
- Deployment platform: Google Cloud Run
- Week of 3/8/20 – Introductions and forming teams
- Week of 10/8/20 – Setting up Trello, Slack and repositories
- Week of 17/8/20 – Tools in operation
- Week of 24/8/20 – Are your requirements agreed?
- Week of 31/8/20 – Drawing your architecture
- Week of 7/9/20 – Do you have the right coding practices?
- Week of 14/9/20 – Discussing feedback so far
- Week of 21/9/20 – Coding
- Week of 28/9/20 – Testing
- Mid-semester break
- Week of 12/10/20: Deployment
- Week of 19/10/20: Delivering the project
- Week of 26/10/20: Presentations
-
Team processes and progress 40%
-
10% for progress by end of Week 6 Feedback given in two ways:
-
a ranking relative to teams in your workshop
-
a rating relative to the TPP rubric below
-
-
10% for progress by end of Week 9 Feedback given in two ways:
-
a ranking relative to teams in your workshop
-
a rating relative to the TPP rubric below
-
-
20% for overall processes by end of project Feedback given in two ways:
-
a ranking relative to teams in your workshop
-
a rating relative to the TPP rubric below
-
Consideration of the following holistic factors:
- Consistency of effort over the semester;
- Response to feedback and mistakes;
- Clarity of communication both internally and externally
-
Outstanding: Team working cooperatively and effectively using defined processes, consistent performance, all members making significant contributions appropriate to their skill and background, using tools well, demonstrating something working at each sprint, something remarkable has been accomplished
-
Excellent: Team working cooperatively and effectively using defined processes, consistent performance, all members making significant contributions appropriate to their skill and background, using tools well, demonstrating something working at each sprint
-
Very Good: Achieving 4 of the 5 conditions of Team working cooperatively and effectively using defined processes, consistent performance, all members making significant contributions appropriate to their skill and background, using tools well, demonstrating something working at each sprint
-
Good: Achieving 3 of the 5 conditions of Team working cooperatively and effectively using defined processes, consistent performance, all members making significant contributions appropriate to their skill and background, using tools well, demonstrating something working at each sprint
-
Satisfactory: Team progressing reasonably over the sprint
-
Passable: Team progressing
-
Failing: Team dysfunctional with little or no progress
- All team members must be part of the presentation.
- Allow for 12-14 minutes
- Suggestions for the presentation:
- One slide on your team;
- One slide on the client and their requirements;
- One slide on the technologies used
- One slide on the communications tool used
- Discuss Key Challenges
- Discuss Lessons Learned
- Assessment:
- 10% of your total mark comprising
- 5% - 3% - 2%
- for Content – style - entertainment value respectively