-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
D(12,k) calculation
Searching for minimal chains of 11 or more consecutive integers all with 12 divisors, we use the procedure described here. We rely on certain elementary mathematical proofs, which we also give below.
Lemmas 1 to 7 below are all derived by the general logic built into pcoul
. So in particular, any pattern pcoul
attempts will include one of
There is a proposed proof that no class B pattern can provide a complete chain of length
For class A patterns, we refine things further following a scheme proposed by Dmitry Petukhov. Each element of a chain must have a factor of the form sq12
, to show that no element in a chain up to pcoul
with the option -p<Z>
, to have it try all combinations within the given pattern of qualifying prime powers
For sq12
is to generate all sq12
takes advantage of Lemmas 1 to 7 below to reject cases more efficiently.
For
I tested -W
option with v20221201 meant that improving this value became less critical.
I currently recommend running pcoul
with -p14e6
.
Class B patterns have already been tested. (1260 patterns, total time 153.16s.)
For
I have currently tested
Class B patterns have already been tested. (872 patterns, total time 271.93s.)
For
For
For
Lemma 1:
- the only other possibility is
$p=64$ , we show manually that this is not part of a chain.
Lemma 2:
-
$\tau(n)$ must be divisible by 5.
Lemma 3:
-
$n = 8m: m \equiv 3 \pmod{4}$ , but then we must have$\tau(m) = 3$ , so$m$ is the square of a prime, which contradicts$m \equiv 3 \pmod{4}$ .
Lemma 4: Any chain of 9 or more consecutive integers with 12 divisors has at least one element that is either of the form
- This follows immediately from Lemmas 1 to 3.
Lemma 5: We cannot have both of
-
$\tau(32p + 8) = 12 \implies \tau(4p+1) = 3$ . So$4p+1$ is the square of a prime, implying$4p \equiv 0 \pmod{24}$ which contradicts$p$ prime. - the only other possibilities are when
$p=2$ or$p=3$ , we show manually that they are not parts of a chain.
Lemma 6: We cannot have both
- In the first case we have
$3q^2 = 16p + 1$ , and in the second case$3q^2 = 16p - 1$ . But with$q$ prime,$3q^2 \equiv 3 \pmod{8}$ , a contradiction.
Lemma 7: If
- This follows immediately from Lemma 6.