-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 238
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A89: xDS Cluster Metric Label #471
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 4 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ | ||
A89: xDS Cluster Metric Label | ||
---- | ||
* Author(s): [Eric Anderson](https://github.com/ejona86) | ||
* Approver: @markdroth | ||
* Status: {Draft, In Review, Ready for Implementation, Implemented} | ||
* Implemented in: <language, ...> | ||
* Last updated: 2025-01-10 | ||
* Discussion at: https://groups.google.com/g/grpc-io/c/s4tm26RiMyI | ||
|
||
## Abstract | ||
|
||
Add a new optional label to per-call metrics containing the xDS cluster being | ||
used for the RPC. | ||
|
||
## Background | ||
|
||
[gRFC A78][A78] added the `grpc.lb.locality` per-call optional label, which also | ||
added the infrastructure to support LBs adding optional labels to per-call | ||
metrics. The optional label can be enabled in the gRPC/OpenTelemetry integration | ||
API added in [gRFC A79][gRFC A79]. | ||
|
||
Similar to how locality metrics are useful for analyzing _where_ traffic is | ||
being routed, the xDS cluster is useful for knowing _to whom_ it is being | ||
routed. `grpc.target` is generally all that's necessary to know which service is | ||
receiving traffic, but non-deterministic routing in xDS like weighted clusters, | ||
aggregate clusters, and cluster specifier plugins mean different clusters (and | ||
thus potentially different services or service versions) would comingle metrics | ||
unless the selected cluster is added as a label. It can also be helpful to know | ||
the selected cluster to confirm that deterministic routing, like path matching, | ||
is behaving as expected. | ||
|
||
### Related Proposals: | ||
* [gRFC A78: gRPC OTel Metrics for WRR, Pick First, and XdsClient][gRFC A78] | ||
* [gRFC A79: Non-per-call Metrics Architecture][gRFC A79] | ||
|
||
[gRFC A78]: A78-grpc-metrics-wrr-pf-xds.md#per-call-metrics | ||
[gRFC A79]: A79-non-per-call-metrics-architecture.md | ||
|
||
## Proposal | ||
|
||
Each pick in the `xds_cluster_impl` policy, `xds_cluster_impl` will add the | ||
optional label `grpc.xds.cluster` to the call attempt tracer. The value will be | ||
copied from `xds_cluster_impl`'s service config `cluster` key. This is done | ||
regardless of the pick's result. It is possible for later picks for the same RPC | ||
to have a different value. This is the case for locality as well, and the last | ||
pick's value should be used. | ||
|
||
The `grpc.xds.cluster` label will be available on the following per-call | ||
metrics: | ||
- `grpc.client.attempt.duration` | ||
- `grpc.client.attempt.sent_total_compressed_message_size` | ||
- `grpc.client.attempt.rcvd_total_compressed_message_size` | ||
|
||
### Temporary environment variable protection | ||
|
||
The new optional label requires calling an API to activate, so environment | ||
variable protection is unnecessary. | ||
|
||
## Rationale | ||
|
||
gRFC A78 added `grpc.lb.locality` to per-call and WRR metrics, while this is | ||
only adding the new label to per-call. Cluster is an xDS-specific concept, so | ||
it is more awkward to add to WRR and that is left as potential future work. | ||
|
||
Which "cluster" was used for a request is ambiguous when using aggregate | ||
clusters as multiple clusters are involved. For placing in a label, there are | ||
two potential choices: the top-level aggregate cluster and the leaf cluster. | ||
Using the leaf cluster seems to provide the most insight when using aggregate | ||
clusters as failing over to a different priority would be significant. If the | ||
top-level cluster is needed in the future, it can be added as well. | ||
|
||
## Implementation | ||
|
||
@ejona86 will immediately implement in gRPC Java. Other languages will follow as | ||
able. The implementation is very quick. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. "The implementation is very quick" is more rationale than blueprint. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It is an answer to "where are the resources coming from." "It is quick, so doesn't need a ton of planning." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yashykt, Java hard-codes support for locality today. I remember there being a conversation about supporting arbitrary optional labels, and I think we had kicked that can down the road.
I'm envisioning just adding another hard-coded case to the otel module for this.