-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 238
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A89: xDS Cluster Metric Label #471
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
to have a different value. This is the case for locality as well, and the last | ||
pick's value should be used. | ||
|
||
The `grpc.xds.cluster` label will be available on the following per-call |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@yashykt, Java hard-codes support for locality today. I remember there being a conversation about supporting arbitrary optional labels, and I think we had kicked that can down the road.
I'm envisioning just adding another hard-coded case to the otel module for this.
## Implementation | ||
|
||
@ejona86 will immediately implement in gRPC Java. Other languages will follow as | ||
able. The implementation is very quick. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"The implementation is very quick" is more rationale than blueprint.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is an answer to "where are the resources coming from." "It is quick, so doesn't need a ton of planning."
I changed the link name so I wouldn't have to specify the link name, and then forgot to remove the link name.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
5 stars, would read again. :)
No description provided.