You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Once we get #806 merged, we'll be into the home stretch of matching fontmake for oswald. This issue is intended to track the remaining sources of difference.
Diffs in the normalized markkern layout-normalizer output:
bigraphs: there is a difference in anchor propagation between fontmake & fontc for glyphs with multiple base components that are not ligatures. The best issue for this is issues with composites' anchor propagation glyphsLib#368 (comment). I believe cosimo has a fix ready for fontmake.
there are various diffs here that were the original impetus for layout-normalizer: some lookups have different ids for instance, and delta indexes differ. I think long term we want to just use normalizer on this full table, and ignore it?
various other differences similar to GPOS, where some ids are different. I think like with GPOS, the answer here is going to be to just improve layout-normalizer and ignore this table (support GSUB in layout-normalizer #800)
some differences in the GDEF categories; I'm not actually sure how we're generating these, it might be that we're sort of getting it by accident via fea-rs? Some of these differences are related to things like the different handling of digraphs, others will need a bit of investigation. ([marks] Generate GDEF class definitions when none exist #805)
the ItemVariationStore differs significantly, but this is probably mostly the result of the GPOS diffs, where we have more deltas because we have more items/rules; we can revisit this after GPOS is matching.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Once we get #806 merged, we'll be into the home stretch of matching fontmake for oswald. This issue is intended to track the remaining sources of difference.
Diffs in the normalized
markkern
layout-normalizer output:Diffs in GPOS.ttx
Diffs in GSUB.ttx
ccmp
feature (two total), but this looks like a bug in fontmake, since the additional feature seems to be identical to the other one, except for a duplicate entry for one lookup? (fixed in [feaLib] don't reference same lookup multiple times within the same feature fonttools/fonttools#3520)Diffs in GDEF.ttx
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: