feat(feedback): capture envelopes

[armcknight]

for #4272; #skip-changelog

capture the user feedback in an envelope. currently, an error is required to have been captured, with its event ID supplied in the user feedback object. so, a dummy error is currently created to satisfy this requirement to be able to see them in the dashboard (see linked issue for progress/results)

TODOs

• (ETA: working!) this currently captures feedback using the old captureFeedback function. need to implement the new feedback envelope format and then capture the envelope that way: https://develop.sentry.dev/application/feedback-architecture/#feedback-events

[github-actions]

	Messages
📖	Do not forget to update Sentry-docs with your feature once the pull request gets approved.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against ded938e

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 62.71186% with 66 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.617%. Comparing base (c810e58) to head (ded938e).
Report is 20 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
Sources/Sentry/SentryClient.m	35.897%	25 Missing ⚠️
...ations/UserFeedback/SentryUserFeedbackWidget.swift	0.000%	9 Missing ⚠️
Sources/Sentry/SentryHub.m	0.000%	6 Missing ⚠️
...Feedback/SentryUserFeedbackIntegrationDriver.swift	0.000%	6 Missing ⚠️
Sources/Sentry/SentryUserFeedbackIntegration.m	0.000%	5 Missing ⚠️
...grations/UserFeedback/SentryUserFeedbackForm.swift	0.000%	5 Missing ⚠️
Sources/Sentry/SentryEnvelope.m	77.777%	4 Missing ⚠️
Sources/Sentry/SentrySDK.m	0.000%	3 Missing ⚠️
Sources/Sentry/SentryDataCategoryMapper.m	90.909%	1 Missing ⚠️
Sources/Sentry/SentryQueueableRequestManager.m	80.000%	1 Missing ⚠️
... and 1 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##              main     #4535       +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage   90.606%   90.617%   +0.010%     
=============================================
  Files          621       623        +2     
  Lines        71095     71289      +194     
  Branches     25309     25990      +681     
=============================================
+ Hits         64417     64600      +183     
- Misses        6587      6591        +4     
- Partials        91        98        +7     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
SentryTestUtils/TestTransportAdapter.swift	84.210% <ø> (+11.483%)	⬆️
Sources/Sentry/SentryHttpTransport.m	98.127% <100.000%> (+0.028%)	⬆️
...ts/Integrations/Feedback/SentryFeedbackTests.swift	100.000% <100.000%> (ø)
...sts/Networking/SentryDataCategoryMapperTests.swift	100.000% <100.000%> (ø)
Sources/Sentry/SentryDataCategoryMapper.m	98.198% <90.909%> (-0.850%)	⬇️
Sources/Sentry/SentryQueueableRequestManager.m	96.666% <80.000%> (-3.334%)	⬇️
...ift/Integrations/UserFeedback/SentryFeedback.swift	97.058% <97.058%> (ø)
Sources/Sentry/SentrySDK.m	87.423% <0.000%> (-0.812%)	⬇️
Sources/Sentry/SentryEnvelope.m	89.320% <77.777%> (-1.206%)	⬇️
Sources/Sentry/SentryUserFeedbackIntegration.m	41.666% <0.000%> (-20.834%)	⬇️
... and 5 more

... and 28 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c810e58...ded938e. Read the comment docs.

[github-actions]

Performance metrics 🚀

	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
Startup time	1231.06 ms	1248.88 ms	17.82 ms
Size	22.32 KiB	766.09 KiB	743.77 KiB

Baseline results on branch: main

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
5e579af	1239.16 ms	1248.49 ms	9.33 ms
5e66a38	1209.10 ms	1233.90 ms	24.79 ms
3277f18	1229.29 ms	1248.92 ms	19.63 ms
3cba0e8	1250.86 ms	1258.39 ms	7.53 ms
7fe37ab	1228.92 ms	1243.86 ms	14.94 ms
0ecf042	1228.25 ms	1250.67 ms	22.42 ms
0970e44	1237.32 ms	1251.53 ms	14.21 ms
e773cad	1221.82 ms	1240.55 ms	18.73 ms
f4a6925	1237.29 ms	1249.35 ms	12.07 ms
216bdf9	1193.69 ms	1217.90 ms	24.21 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
5e579af	21.58 KiB	656.60 KiB	635.01 KiB
5e66a38	22.85 KiB	408.88 KiB	386.03 KiB
3277f18	22.84 KiB	402.88 KiB	380.03 KiB
3cba0e8	22.84 KiB	403.19 KiB	380.34 KiB
7fe37ab	21.58 KiB	542.28 KiB	520.70 KiB
0ecf042	21.58 KiB	631.82 KiB	610.24 KiB
0970e44	22.32 KiB	761.50 KiB	739.18 KiB
e773cad	21.58 KiB	681.75 KiB	660.17 KiB
f4a6925	21.58 KiB	706.47 KiB	684.89 KiB
216bdf9	21.58 KiB	418.13 KiB	396.54 KiB

Previous results on branch: armcknight/feat(user-feedback)/envelope

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
46f819e	1216.73 ms	1238.35 ms	21.61 ms
3c44525	1230.98 ms	1250.49 ms	19.51 ms
3f71d28	1231.12 ms	1253.88 ms	22.76 ms
c5dac22	1229.73 ms	1252.24 ms	22.51 ms
6fbfc91	1237.08 ms	1256.96 ms	19.88 ms
86abdac	1209.79 ms	1233.82 ms	24.02 ms
68416bc	1227.29 ms	1247.86 ms	20.57 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
46f819e	22.30 KiB	759.88 KiB	737.58 KiB
3c44525	22.32 KiB	765.14 KiB	742.82 KiB
3f71d28	22.30 KiB	759.88 KiB	737.58 KiB
c5dac22	22.31 KiB	760.57 KiB	738.26 KiB
6fbfc91	21.90 KiB	746.34 KiB	724.43 KiB
86abdac	21.90 KiB	744.30 KiB	722.40 KiB
68416bc	22.31 KiB	760.79 KiB	738.48 KiB

[philipphofmann]

I know this is a draft, but I already gave you early feedback.

[philipphofmann]

A few comments.

[philipphofmann]

LGTM, but the testing approach seems quite strange to me. I don't want this to block this PR though.