-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 407
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move extension tests to their own file #6954
Merged
Merged
+995
−972
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
elprans
approved these changes
Mar 1, 2024
They are slow and large and I usually don't actually care to run them when running ddl tests.
3932e82
to
ce7feed
Compare
aljazerzen
approved these changes
Mar 1, 2024
I observed flakes here earlier, but they went away. I'm going to merge this now, then send up a clean PR to address that flake and another, since it involves some infrastructure |
msullivan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2024
In general we should be using retrying transactions. Our isolated tests do retries at the outside, but non-isolated ones don't necessarily. Implement _run_and_rollback_retrying and use it some places that TransactionSerializationError flakes have been seen (in #6954 and in nightly CI). Honestly I don't really think that these places ought to be having TransactionSerializationErrors, but also it really is pretty required to do retries when using SERIALIZABLE, so we should start moving towards being more consistent about it.
msullivan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2024
In general we should be using retrying transactions. Our isolated tests do retries at the outside, but non-isolated ones don't necessarily. Implement _run_and_rollback_retrying and use it some places that TransactionSerializationError flakes have been seen (in #6954 and in nightly CI). Honestly I don't really think that these places ought to be having TransactionSerializationErrors, but also it really is pretty required to do retries when using SERIALIZABLE, so we should start moving towards being more consistent about it.
msullivan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2024
They are slow and large and I usually don't actually care to run them when running ddl tests.
msullivan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2024
In general we should be using retrying transactions. Our isolated tests do retries at the outside, but non-isolated ones don't necessarily. Implement _run_and_rollback_retrying and use it some places that TransactionSerializationError flakes have been seen (in #6954 and in nightly CI). Honestly I don't really think that these places ought to be having TransactionSerializationErrors, but also it really is pretty required to do retries when using SERIALIZABLE, so we should start moving towards being more consistent about it.
msullivan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2024
They are slow and large and I usually don't actually care to run them when running ddl tests.
msullivan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 7, 2024
In general we should be using retrying transactions. Our isolated tests do retries at the outside, but non-isolated ones don't necessarily. Implement _run_and_rollback_retrying and use it some places that TransactionSerializationError flakes have been seen (in #6954 and in nightly CI). Honestly I don't really think that these places ought to be having TransactionSerializationErrors, but also it really is pretty required to do retries when using SERIALIZABLE, so we should start moving towards being more consistent about it.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
They are slow and large and I usually don't actually care to run them
when running ddl tests.