Skip to content

e6000sw: Add support for MV88E6190X switch variant #1408

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
31 changes: 26 additions & 5 deletions sys/dev/etherswitch/e6000sw/e6000sw.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ e6000sw_probe(device_t dev)
phandle_t switch_node;
#else
int is_6190;
int is_6190x;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, for is_6190 the code assumes one of the two properties is present (otherwise this is left uninitialised). That's a bit dodgy, but for is_6190x you definitely can't assume that otherwise you will break existing hints that predate the existence of is_6190x.

#endif

sc = device_get_softc(dev);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -251,6 +252,10 @@ e6000sw_probe(device_t dev)
if (resource_int_value(device_get_name(sc->dev),
device_get_unit(sc->dev), "addr", &sc->sw_addr) != 0)
return (ENXIO);

resource_int_value(device_get_name(sc->dev),
device_get_unit(sc->dev), "is6190x", &is_6190x);

if (resource_int_value(device_get_name(sc->dev),
device_get_unit(sc->dev), "is6190", &is_6190) != 0)
/*
Expand All @@ -259,8 +264,16 @@ e6000sw_probe(device_t dev)
*/
resource_int_value(device_get_name(sc->dev),
device_get_unit(sc->dev), "is8190", &is_6190);

if (is_6190 !=0 && is_6190x != 0)
if (bootverbose)
device_printf(dev, "Cannot configure conflicting variants\n");
return (ENXIO);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given the lack of curly braces amounts to an unconditional return (ENXIO) I don't see how this could possibly have been tested.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The committed change has braces though


if (is_6190 != 0)
sc->swid = MV88E6190;
else if (is_6190x != 0)
sc->swid = MV88E6190X;
#endif
if (sc->sw_addr < 0 || sc->sw_addr > 32)
return (ENXIO);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -302,6 +315,10 @@ e6000sw_probe(device_t dev)
description = "Marvell 88E6190";
sc->num_ports = 11;
break;
case MV88E6190X:
description = "Marvell 88E6190X";
sc->num_ports = 11;
break;
default:
device_printf(dev, "Unrecognized device, id 0x%x.\n", sc->swid);
return (ENXIO);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -332,7 +349,7 @@ e6000sw_parse_fixed_link(e6000sw_softc_t *sc, phandle_t node, uint32_t port)
return (ENXIO);
}
if (speed == 2500 && (MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6141) ||
MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6341) || MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6190)))
MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6341) || MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6190) || MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6190X)))
sc->fixed25_mask |= (1 << port);
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -596,22 +613,26 @@ e6000sw_attach(device_t dev)
reg |= PSC_CONTROL_SPD2500;
else
reg |= PSC_CONTROL_SPD1000;
if (MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6190) &&
if (MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6190) ||
MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6190X)) &&
e6000sw_is_fixed25port(sc, port))
reg |= PSC_CONTROL_ALT_SPD;
reg |= PSC_CONTROL_FORCED_DPX | PSC_CONTROL_FULLDPX |
PSC_CONTROL_FORCED_LINK | PSC_CONTROL_LINK_UP |
PSC_CONTROL_FORCED_SPD;
if (!MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6190))
if (!MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6190) &&
!MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6190X))
reg |= PSC_CONTROL_FORCED_FC | PSC_CONTROL_FC_ON;
if (MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6141) ||
MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6341) ||
MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6190))
MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6190) ||
MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6190X))
reg |= PSC_CONTROL_FORCED_EEE;
e6000sw_writereg(sc, REG_PORT(sc, port), PSC_CONTROL,
reg);
/* Power on the SERDES interfaces. */
if (MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6190) &&
if (MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6190) ||
MVSWITCH(sc, MV88E6190X)) &&
(port == 9 || port == 10)) {
if (e6000sw_is_fixed25port(sc, port))
sgmii = false;
Expand Down
9 changes: 5 additions & 4 deletions sys/dev/etherswitch/e6000sw/e6000swreg.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct atu_opt {
#define MV88E6172 0x1720
#define MV88E6176 0x1760
#define MV88E6190 0x1900
#define MV88E6190X 0x0a00

#define MVSWITCH(_sc, id) ((_sc)->swid == (id))
#define MVSWITCH_MULTICHIP(_sc) ((_sc)->sw_addr != 0)
Expand All @@ -56,7 +57,7 @@ struct atu_opt {
*/
#define REG_GLOBAL 0x1b
#define REG_GLOBAL2 0x1c
#define REG_PORT(_sc, p) ((MVSWITCH((_sc), MV88E6190) ? 0 : 0x10) + (p))
#define REG_PORT(_sc, p) ((MVSWITCH((_sc), MV88E6190) || MVSWITCH((_sc), MV88E6190X) ? 0 : 0x10) + (p))

#define REG_NUM_MAX 31

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -138,13 +139,13 @@ struct atu_opt {
#define VTU_DATA 7
#define VTU_DATA2 8

#define VTU_FID_MASK(_sc) (MVSWITCH((_sc), MV88E6190) ? 0xfff : 0xff)
#define VTU_FID_MASK(_sc) (MVSWITCH((_sc), MV88E6190) || MVSWITCH((_sc), MV88E6190X) ? 0xfff : 0xff)
#define VTU_FID_POLICY (1 << 12)
#define VTU_PORT_UNMODIFIED 0
#define VTU_PORT_UNTAGGED 1
#define VTU_PORT_TAGGED 2
#define VTU_PORT_DISCARD 3
#define VTU_PPREG(_sc) (MVSWITCH((_sc), MV88E6190) ? 8 : 4)
#define VTU_PPREG(_sc) (MVSWITCH((_sc), MV88E6190) || MVSWITCH((_sc), MV88E6190X) ? 8 : 4)
#define VTU_PORT(_sc, p) (((p) % VTU_PPREG(_sc)) * (16 / VTU_PPREG(_sc)))
#define VTU_PORT_MASK 3
#define VTU_BUSY (1 << 15)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -174,7 +175,7 @@ struct atu_opt {
#define ATU_MAC_ADDR45 15

#define ATU_DATA_LAG (1 << 15)
#define ATU_PORT_MASK(_sc) (MVSWITCH((_sc), MV88E6190) ? 0xfff0 : 0xff0)
#define ATU_PORT_MASK(_sc) (MVSWITCH((_sc), MV88E6190) || MVSWITCH((_sc), MV88E6190X) ? 0xfff0 : 0xff0)
#define ATU_PORT_SHIFT 4
#define ATU_LAG_MASK 0xf0
#define ATU_LAG_SHIFT 4
Expand Down