Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Set deprecation for sooner (warning has been around for a year) #2351

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

esantorella
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:
Context for this stack: we've been meaning to deprecate ALEBO and REMBO for a long time. Tests on them break periodically and slow down development of GenerationStrategy, which these classes hack around, so there's substantial maintenance burden to keeping them.

Context for this diff, RfC: 0.5.0 is a long-ways away. Let's deprecate these in the version after next one we cut.

Reviewed By: saitcakmak

Differential Revision: D56038505

Lena Kashtelyan added 2 commits April 11, 2024 15:21
…n't depent on it

Summary:
Context for this stack: we've been meaning to deprecate ALEBO and REMBO for a long time. Tests on them break periodically and slow down development of `GenerationStrategy`, which these classes hack around, so there's substantial maintenance burden to keeping them.

Context for this diff: LCE-A was depending on ALEBO for, it seems, no reason other than convenience of where the acquisition function constructor lived. This diff aims to address.

**[RfC] But also this made me wonder: maybe better to replace use of `ei_or_nei` in LCE-A with something newer?**

Differential Revision: D56037477
Summary:
Context for this stack: we've been meaning to deprecate ALEBO and REMBO for a long time. Tests on them break periodically and slow down development of GenerationStrategy, which these classes hack around, so there's substantial maintenance burden to keeping them.

Context for this diff, RfC: 0.5.0 is a long-ways away. Let's deprecate these in the version after next one we cut.

Reviewed By: saitcakmak

Differential Revision: D56038505
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label Apr 11, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D56038505

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in bedc207.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants