Fix partial eigenspectrum indexing convention for ScaLAPACK API #1248
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
msimberg
approved these changes
Dec 19, 2024
|
cscs-ci run |
RMeli
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR #1194 introduced the possibility to compute a partial eigenspectrum. The convention for the C-DLAF and C-ScaLAPACK APIs used was the same, i.e. base 0 indexing. As pointed out by @rasolca in eth-cscs/DLA-Future-Fortran#27 (review) it would be better to have base 1 indexing for the C-ScaLAPACK API (while retaining base 0 indexing for the C-DLAF API).
This PR changes the indexing convention of the C-ScaLAPACK from base 0 to base 1 indexing.