CRAN Release 0.11.0

[strengejacke]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.15385% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 60.26%. Comparing base (01eff88) to head (cc1342d).

Files	Patch %	Lines
R/check_model_diagnostics.R	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #700      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   59.88%   60.26%   +0.37%     
==========================================
  Files          86       86              
  Lines        6252     6274      +22     
==========================================
+ Hits         3744     3781      +37     
+ Misses       2508     2493      -15     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[IndrajeetPatil]

I can't reproduce this locally. The only problem I see is the following, irrespective of whether parallel testing is on or not:

Error (test-logLik.R:8:3): logLik
<expressionStackOverflowError/stackOverflowError/error/condition>
Error: evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion / options(expressions=)?

[strengejacke]

Thanks for testing! Could it be related that this code allows too many iterations/nesting?

withr::local_options(list(expressions = 25))

[IndrajeetPatil]

I am not sure where that option is used but that's possible.

Are we sure that there is no circular referencing between our functions in this context: performance calls effectsize which calls performance, or something of that sort?

[strengejacke]

I don't think so. insight is failing on win devel only, too, and this is new - I just submitted last weekend and everything was fine. On current windows, everything is ok for insight and performance, and for linux r devel, too. It must be something that recently changed, either a package update (I suspected glmmTMB because that example was failing, although it was just a simple model) or win-devel update.

[strengejacke]

I just saw, the loglik test is skipped on CRAN, anyway, so can't be the cause.

[strengejacke]

skipping all tests and examples that involve glmmTMB resolve the issues...

[strengejacke]

See glmmTMB/glmmTMB#1007 (comment)

[strengejacke]

Will submit next week.