Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[core-api][experimental] report_runless_asset_event #26678

Conversation

OwenKephart
Copy link
Contributor

Summary & Motivation

decision: experimental -> public
reason: been in use for a long time, and we're committed to the feature
docs exist: yes

How I Tested These Changes

Changelog

Insert changelog entry or delete this section.

@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 12-23-_core-api_experimental_report_runless_asset_event_ branch from 279e003 to 4df6dab Compare December 31, 2024 18:46
@OwenKephart OwenKephart changed the base branch from master to core-api-audit December 31, 2024 18:46
@OwenKephart OwenKephart mentioned this pull request Dec 31, 2024
@OwenKephart OwenKephart marked this pull request as ready for review December 31, 2024 18:50
@OwenKephart OwenKephart force-pushed the 12-23-_core-api_experimental_report_runless_asset_event_ branch from 4df6dab to eb93ea8 Compare December 31, 2024 19:18
@OwenKephart OwenKephart changed the base branch from core-api-audit to 12-23-_core-api_experimental_exclude_subruns December 31, 2024 19:18
## Summary & Motivation

decision: experimental -> public
reason: this has existed for a long time and we do not have plans to
change it
docs exist: yes

## How I Tested These Changes

## Changelog

> Insert changelog entry or delete this section.
@OwenKephart OwenKephart merged commit 2899e4b into 12-23-_core-api_experimental_exclude_subruns Dec 31, 2024
1 check was pending
@OwenKephart OwenKephart deleted the 12-23-_core-api_experimental_report_runless_asset_event_ branch December 31, 2024 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants