Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use reusable integration test workflow #354

Merged
merged 31 commits into from
Nov 28, 2023

Conversation

carlcsaposs-canonical
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@carlcsaposs-canonical carlcsaposs-canonical force-pushed the reusable-integration-workflow branch from 69f7e35 to be2678c Compare November 16, 2023 12:21
@carlcsaposs-canonical
Copy link
Contributor Author

needs #355

@carlcsaposs-canonical carlcsaposs-canonical force-pushed the reusable-integration-workflow branch 2 times, most recently from 04b755c to d4dc431 Compare November 17, 2023 07:57
@carlcsaposs-canonical carlcsaposs-canonical force-pushed the reusable-integration-workflow branch from 6e9dd85 to 5899116 Compare November 24, 2023 10:57
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 24, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@8afdce6). Click here to learn what that means.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #354   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   65.43%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       17           
  Lines           ?     3127           
  Branches        ?      415           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     2046           
  Misses          ?      950           
  Partials        ?      131           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@carlcsaposs-canonical carlcsaposs-canonical marked this pull request as ready for review November 27, 2023 07:47
Copy link
Contributor

@taurus-forever taurus-forever left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wow, this is way nicer now.

Q: why did we run unit test for Juju 2.9 and 3.1 earlier (no neither Juju nor libjuju used in unit tests)? I am confused here...

@carlcsaposs-canonical
Copy link
Contributor Author

Q: why did we run unit test for Juju 2.9 and 3.1 earlier (no neither Juju nor libjuju used in unit tests)? I am confused here...

@juditnovak can probably explain it better than I can

tl;dr a quick solution to get unit tests with & without secrets working, I think

@carlcsaposs-canonical carlcsaposs-canonical force-pushed the reusable-integration-workflow branch from d754f48 to 133c6a5 Compare November 28, 2023 13:34
Copy link
Contributor

@shayancanonical shayancanonical left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@carlcsaposs-canonical carlcsaposs-canonical merged commit f8f49dd into main Nov 28, 2023
38 of 39 checks passed
@carlcsaposs-canonical carlcsaposs-canonical deleted the reusable-integration-workflow branch November 28, 2023 14:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants