Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Exoscale architecture reference documentation #297

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024

Conversation

DebakelOrakel
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@DebakelOrakel DebakelOrakel changed the title Add Exoscale architecture reference documentation Draft: Add Exoscale architecture reference documentation Dec 15, 2023
@DebakelOrakel DebakelOrakel force-pushed the ocp-942/ref-architecture-exoscale branch 3 times, most recently from 129097e to ed2bd9f Compare December 15, 2023 14:23
@DebakelOrakel DebakelOrakel changed the title Draft: Add Exoscale architecture reference documentation Add Exoscale architecture reference documentation Dec 15, 2023
@DebakelOrakel DebakelOrakel force-pushed the ocp-942/ref-architecture-exoscale branch 2 times, most recently from 14dc385 to 19ab2a4 Compare December 15, 2023 14:38
@DebakelOrakel DebakelOrakel force-pushed the ocp-942/ref-architecture-exoscale branch from 19ab2a4 to 0ec72e1 Compare December 15, 2023 15:29
@DebakelOrakel DebakelOrakel requested a review from a team December 18, 2023 11:07
Copy link
Contributor

@corvus-ch corvus-ch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix the following aspects:

  • Make it more obvious that on Exoscale nodes are directly connected to the internet and that outgoing (egress) connections have a nodes IP as its source which can change over time.
  • Add the Rook Ceph storage cluster which is mandatory for Exoscale clusters.

@DebakelOrakel DebakelOrakel force-pushed the ocp-942/ref-architecture-exoscale branch 3 times, most recently from c010be6 to e513311 Compare January 8, 2024 08:19
Copy link
Contributor

@corvus-ch corvus-ch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The VSHN managed storage cluster is a requirement and not an optional add-on.
Plus, we should get rid of those empty menu entries where ever possible. At least we should not introduce new ones.

docs/modules/ROOT/partials/architecture/storage.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/modules/ROOT/partials/nav.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@DebakelOrakel DebakelOrakel force-pushed the ocp-942/ref-architecture-exoscale branch from f9f99d7 to 93b9942 Compare January 17, 2024 14:17
@DebakelOrakel DebakelOrakel merged commit 76e45e0 into master Jan 18, 2024
1 check passed
@DebakelOrakel DebakelOrakel deleted the ocp-942/ref-architecture-exoscale branch January 18, 2024 06:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants