Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cw20 kernel routing #723
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Cw20 kernel routing #723
Changes from 3 commits
9affb8e
1fe10f1
ec24cac
ab54bb6
c354fbc
6df4bed
51a409d
8bff34d
edad495
7c418e1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the code analysis from previous results, I can now provide the final response:
CW20 token validation needs improvement
The current implementation of
handle_receive_cw20
lacks explicit validation of the CW20 token contract address. While it uses the sender address (info.sender
) as the asset identifier, there's no whitelist or validation mechanism to ensure only trusted CW20 tokens are processed. Additionally:nonpayable
but lacks token-specific validationNotImplemented
erroramp_receive_cw20
which focuses on message handling rather than token validationSuggested improvements:
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify CW20 token validation
The new match arm correctly delegates CW20 reception to the dedicated handler. Please ensure that:
Let's verify the CW20 token validation:
Let me gather more information about the CW20 receive handler implementation:
Let me analyze the CW20 token validation one more time by looking at the message types and error handling:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 26678
Script:
Length of output: 8441
Script:
Length of output: 149