-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cw20 kernel routing #723
Open
joemonem
wants to merge
10
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
cw20-kernel-routing
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Cw20 kernel routing #723
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9affb8e
feat: cw20 support for kernel routing
joemonem 1fe10f1
ref: enable amp msgs in splitter
joemonem ec24cac
feat: enable kernel amp msgs in set amount splitter
joemonem ab54bb6
chore: version bumps and changelog entry
joemonem c354fbc
fix: kernel versioning
joemonem 6df4bed
Merge branch 'main' into cw20-kernel-routing
joemonem 51a409d
fix: return error instead of todo for ibc scenario, check for empty f…
joemonem 8bff34d
Merge branch 'cw20-kernel-routing' of https://github.com/andromedapro…
joemonem edad495
merge with main
joemonem 7c418e1
chore: merge with main, version change
joemonem File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the code analysis from previous results, I can now provide the final response:
CW20 token validation needs improvement
The current implementation of
handle_receive_cw20
lacks explicit validation of the CW20 token contract address. While it uses the sender address (info.sender
) as the asset identifier, there's no whitelist or validation mechanism to ensure only trusted CW20 tokens are processed. Additionally:nonpayable
but lacks token-specific validationNotImplemented
erroramp_receive_cw20
which focuses on message handling rather than token validationSuggested improvements:
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify CW20 token validation
The new match arm correctly delegates CW20 reception to the dedicated handler. Please ensure that:
Let's verify the CW20 token validation:
Let me gather more information about the CW20 receive handler implementation:
Let me analyze the CW20 token validation one more time by looking at the message types and error handling:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 26678
Script:
Length of output: 8441
Script:
Length of output: 149