Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Only unmarshal unapproved events in gravity migration #574

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2025

Conversation

cbrit
Copy link
Member

@cbrit cbrit commented Jan 28, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved event vote record deletion logic to handle approved and unapproved events more precisely
    • Refined processing of event records to prevent unnecessary operations on already accepted events

@cbrit cbrit requested a review from zmanian January 28, 2025 17:12
@cbrit cbrit merged commit de86d6e into main Jan 28, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes modify the DeletePendingEventVoteRecords method in the Migrator struct within the Gravity module. The primary modification introduces a conditional check to skip processing of approved events. When an event vote record is marked as accepted, the method immediately returns false, preventing further processing of that record. The logic for handling unapproved events has been refined to focus exclusively on events that are not approved and have a nonce greater than the last observed event nonce.

Changes

File Change Summary
module/x/gravity/keeper/migrations.go Modified DeletePendingEventVoteRecords method to add a conditional check for approved events, preventing their processing

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Migrator
    participant EventVoteRecord
    
    Migrator->>EventVoteRecord: Check if event is accepted
    alt Event is accepted
        Migrator-->>EventVoteRecord: Return false, skip processing
    else Event is not accepted
        Migrator->>EventVoteRecord: Check event nonce
        alt Nonce is greater than last observed
            Migrator-->>EventVoteRecord: Process deletion
        else Nonce is not greater
            Migrator-->>EventVoteRecord: Skip deletion
        end
    end
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 029b0fe and 4311069.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • module/x/gravity/keeper/migrations.go (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants